Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Posterior pituitary hematoma in a case of posttraumatic diabetes insipidus: Case report

Kawai, Kensuke, Aoki, Makoto, Nakayama, Hitoshi, Kobayashi, Kunio, Sano, Keiji, Tamura, Akira·1995·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ A 28-year-old man presented with diabetes insipidus (DI) 10 days after basilar skull fracture without brain injury. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a hematoma in the posterior lobe of the pituitary gland but no lesions in the hypothalamus or pituitary stalk. The patient's DI continued for 2 months at which time transsphenoidal surgery was performed to decompress the cystic hematoma with persistent mass effect. The DI attenuated shortly after the surgery and the patient became completely free from DI 5 months later. Although hemorrhage into the posterior lobe is one of the frequent pathological changes in fatal head-injury victims and secondary DI in these cases has usually been thought to be acute and transient, the true incidence and natural course of the posterior pituitary hemorrhage and subsequent DI in nonfatal head-injury patients are totally unknown. In this article, the authors present the first demonstration on MR imaging of a posterior pituitary hematoma in a patient with head injury. The authors propose that serial MR imaging is an important diagnostic tool in patients with posttraumatic DI because some of them may harbor pituitary hematoma and because decompression surgery may prevent transition to permanent DI, especially in cases when the mass effect is persistent due to a cystic change in the hematoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0368

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Crompton MR, 1975, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol 23. Injuries of the Brain and Skull. Part I., 465
  2. Daniel P, 1966, The Pituitary Gland 2., 519
  3. Edwards OM, 1986, Medicine, 65, 281, 10.1097/00005792-198609000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Graham DI, 1987, Head Injury, 72
  5. 10.3171/jns.1985.63.3.0456 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Halimi P, 1988, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 12, 135, 10.1097/00004728-198801000-00026 · DOI
  7. Kaufman HH, 1993, Med Clin North Am, 77, 43, 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30271-1 · DOI
  8. Notman D, 1980, J Trauma, 20, 599, 10.1097/00005373-198007000-00009 · DOI
  9. Popp AJ, 1985, Neurosurgery., 2, 1536
  10. 10.3171/jns.1990.73.3.0453 · DOI
  11. Tien R, 1991, AJNR, 12, 533

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kawai, K., Aoki, M., Nakayama, H., Kobayashi, K., Sano, K., & Tamura, A.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1995-08
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
368-371
ISSN
0022-3085
Cited by
12
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.