The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine
Abstract
✓ Interactive frameless stereotaxy has been successfully applied to intracranial surgery. It has contributed to the improved localization of deep-seated brain lesions and has demonstrated a potential for reducing both operative time and morbidity. However, it has not been as effectively applied to spinal surgery. The authors describe the application of frameless stereotactic techniques to spinal surgery, specifically pedicle screw fixation of the lumbosacral spine. Preoperative axial computerized tomography (CT) images of the appropriate spinal segments are obtained and loaded onto a high-speed graphics supercomputer workstation. Intraoperatively, these images can be linked to the appropriate spinal anatomy by a sonic localization digitizer device that is interfaced with the computer workstation. This permits the surgeon to place a pointing device (sonic wand) on any exposed spinal bone landmark in the operative field and obtain multiplanar reconstructed CT images projected in near-real time on the workstation screen. The images can be manipulated to assist the surgeon in determining the proper entry point for a pedicle screw as well as defining the appropriate trajectory in the axial and sagittal planes. It can also define the correct screw length and diameter for each pedicle to be instrumented. The authors applied this device to the insertion of 150 screws into the lumbosacral spines of 30 patients. One hundred forty-nine screws were assessed to be satisfactorily placed by postoperative CT and plain film radiography. In this report the authors discuss their use of this device in the clinical setting and review their preliminary results of frameless stereotaxy applied to spinal surgery. On the basis of their findings, the authors conclude that frameless stereotactic technology can be successfully applied to spinal surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amiot, L.-P., Lang, K., Putzier, M., Zippel, H., & Labelle, H. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200003010-00012 · Cited by 450
Rajasekaran, S., Vidyadhara, S., Ramesh, P., & Shetty, A. P. (2007) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab · Cited by 358
Worldwide Survey on the Use of Navigation in Spine Surgery
Härtl, R., Lam, K. S., Wang, J., Korge, A., Kandziora, F., & Audigé, L. (2013) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.011 · Cited by 270
Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery – a review and an assessment of technology
Hassfeld, S., & Mühling, J. (2001) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0024 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalfas, I. H., Kormos, D. W., Murphy, M. A., McKenzie, R. L., Barnett, G. H., Bell, G. R., Steiner, C. P., Trimble, M. B., & Weisenberger, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 641-647
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113413823
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0641
- The paper
- Kalfas, I. H., Kormos, D. W., Murphy, M. A., McKenzie, R. L., Barnett, G. H., Bell, G. R., Steiner, C. P., Trimble, M. B., & Weisenberger, J. P. (1995). Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.