Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Accuracy of Navigated and Non-Navigated Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Deformity Correction Surgeries

Rajasekaran, S, Vidyadhara, S, Ramesh, Perumal, Shetty, Ajoy P.·2007·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial (level I evidence). OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of non-navigation and Iso-C based navigation in pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic pedicle screw insertion for spinal deformity correction can be associated with increased pedicle breaches. Iso-C based navigation has been reported to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, but its use in the presence of deformity has not been reported. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with scoliosis and 6 patients with kyphosis had a total of 478 thoracic pedicle screws. The average Cobb angle was 58.4 degrees +/- 8 degrees (range 50 degrees -80 degrees), and the mean kyphotic angle was 54.6 degrees +/- 4 degrees (range 51 degrees -76 degrees). By random allocation, 17 patients had screw insertion under navigation (242 screws) and 16 under fluoroscopic control (236 screws). The 2 groups were compared for accuracy of screw placement, time for screw insertion, and the number of times the C-arm had to be brought into the field. Two independent blinded observers determined accuracy using postoperative computed tomography assessments. RESULTS: There were 54 (23%) pedicle breaches in the non-navigation group as compared to only 5 (2%) in the navigation group (P < 0.001). Thirty-eight screws (16%) in the non-navigation group had penetrated the anterior or lateral cortex compared to 2 screws (0.8%) in the navigation group. Average screw insertion time in the non-navigation group was 4.61 +/- 1.05 minutes (range 1.8-6.5) compared to 2.37 +/- 0.72 minutes (range 1.16-4.5) in navigation group (P < 0.01). The C-arm had to be moved into the operation field on an average of 1.5 +/- 0.25 times (range 1-3) per screw. With single screening data, an average of 11.4 pedicles (range 9-14) could be visualized without necessity to bring the C-arm into operating field again. CONCLUSIONS: Iso-C navigation increases accuracy, and reduces surgical time and radiation in thoracic deformity correction surgeries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Rajasekaran, S., Vidyadhara, S., Ramesh, P., & Shetty, A. P.
Venue
Spine
Published
2007-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
E56-E64
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081494650
Cited by
358
References
28
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Accuracy of Navigated and Non-Navigated Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Deformity Correction Surgeries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab
The paper
Rajasekaran, S., Vidyadhara, S., Ramesh, P., & Shetty, A. P. (2007). Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Accuracy of Navigated and Non-Navigated Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Deformity Correction Surgeries. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.