Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of vasogenic and cellular edema to traumatic brain swelling measured by diffusion-weighted imaging

Barzó, Pál, Marmarou, Anthony, Fatouros, Panos, Hayasaki, Koji, Corwin, Frank·1997·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ The contribution of brain edema to brain swelling in cases of traumatic brain injury remains a critical problem. The authors believe that cellular edema, the result of complex neurotoxic events, is the major contributor to brain swelling and that vasogenic edema, secondary to blood-brain barrier compromise, may be overemphasized. The objective of this study, therefore, was to quantify temporal water content changes and document the type of edema that forms during the acute and late stages of edema development following closed head injury (CHI). The measurement of brain water content was based on magnetic resonance imaging—determined values of tissue longitudinal relaxation time (T 1-weighted imaging) and their subsequent conversion to percentage of water, whereas the differentiation of edema formation (cellular vs. vasogenic) was based on the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) by diffusion-weighted imaging. A new impact-acceleration model was used to induce CHI. Thirty-six adult Sprague—Dawley rats were separated into two groups: Group I, control (six animals); and Group II, trauma (30 animals). Fast ADC measurements (localized, single-voxel) were obtained sequentially (every minute) up to 1 hour postinjury. The T 1-weighted images, used for water content determination, and the diffusion-weighted images (ADC measurement with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging) were obtained at the end of the 1st hour postinjury and on Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 42 in animals from the trauma and control groups. In the animals subjected to trauma, the authors found a significant increase in ADC (10 ± 5%) and brain water content (1.3 ± 0.9%) during the first 60 minutes postinjury. This is consistent with an increase in the volume of extracellular fluid and vasogenic edema formation as a result of blood-brain barrier compromise. This transient increase, however, was followed by a continuing decrease in ADC that began 40 to 60 minutes postinjury and reached a minimum value on Days 7 to 14 (10 ± 3% reduction). Because the water content of the brain continued to increase during the first 24 hours postinjury (1.9 ± 0.9%), it is suggested that the decreased ADC indicated cellular edema formation, which started to develop soon after injury and became dominant between 1 and 2 weeks postinjury. The study provides supportive evidence that cellular edema is the major contributor to posttraumatic swelling in diffuse CHI and defines the onset and duration of the increase in cellular volume.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1997.87.6.0900

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Barzó, P., Marmarou, A., Fatouros, P., Hayasaki, K., & Corwin, F.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1997-12
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
900-907
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093126739
Cited by
371
References
4
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.