Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis
Abstract
Object. The authors sought to minimize scalp incisions, blood loss, and operative time by using endoscopically assisted strip craniectomies and barrel-stave osteotomies to treat infants with sagittal suture synostosis. Methods. Four patients, aged 2, 4, 9, and 12 weeks, who presented with scaphocephaly underwent endoscopic midline craniectomies through small midline scalp incisions. The mean operative time for the procedure was 1.68 hours (range 1.15–2.8 hours); the mean blood loss was 54.2 ml (range 12–150 ml). Three patients did not require blood transfusions and were discharged within 24 hours. Postoperatively, all patients were fitted with custom cranial molding helmets. Follow-up evaluation ranged between 8 and 15 months. All patients had successful correction of their scaphocephaly with no mortalities, morbidities, or complications. Conclusions. The use of endoscopic techniques for early correction of sagittal synostosis is safe; decreases blood loss, operative time, and hospitalization costs; and provides excellent early surgical results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Open surgery provides immediate correction but is more invasive, with higher risks of complications such as significant blood loss and scarring.
“Open surgery provides immediate correction but is more invasive, with higher risks of complications like significant blood loss and scarring [9–11].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Endoscopic surgery offers reduced blood loss, shorter operation times, and minimal scarring but often requires postoperative helmet therapy.
“The endoscopic method offers benefits like reduced blood loss, shorter operation times, and minimal scarring but often requires postoperative helmet therapy.”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In Jimenez & Barone's follow-up, all patients had successful and sustained correction of scaphocephaly.
“In a subsequent follow-up visit after eight to 15 months, the authors found that all patients had undergone successful and sustained correction of the scaphocephaly [9].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Jimenez & Barone's endoscopic technique with Barrel-Staves osteotomies had an average operating time of 1.68 h and average blood loss of 54.2 ml.
“An average operating time of 1.68 h with an average blood loss of 54.2 ml was determined.”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In Jimenez & Barone's initial four patients, three did not require blood transfusion and were discharged after 24 h.
“Three out of four patients did not require a blood transfusion and could be discharged after just 24 h.”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
ESC with barrel staves markedly decreased transfusion rates and mortality risk.
“In contrast, the introduction of ESC with barrel staves in the late 1990s by Jimenez and Barone, which was made possible by technological advances in image-guided surgery, instrumentation and neuroendoscopy, resulted in a reduction in blood loss to an average of 27 ml, markedly decreasing transfusion rates and mortality risk [9, 50].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Introduction of endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with barrel staves in the late 1990s resulted in a reduction in blood loss to an average of 27 ml.
“In contrast, the introduction of ESC with barrel staves in the late 1990s by Jimenez and Barone, which was made possible by technological advances in image-guided surgery, instrumentation and neuroendoscopy, resulted in a reduction in blood loss to an average of 27 ml, markedly decreasing transfusion rates and mortality risk [9, 50].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Endoscopic procedures have the advantage of requiring fewer skin incisions and less blood loss and are considered less invasive and more child-friendly.
“They have the advantage of requiring fewer skin incisions and less blood loss and are therefore considered less invasive and more child-friendly [64,65,66,67,68,69,70].”
From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
The endoscopic-assisted method often necessitates postoperative helmet therapy to guide skull remodeling.
“However, it often necessitates postoperative helmet therapy to guide skull remodeling [9, 10].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The endoscopic-assisted method offers advantages such as reduced blood transfusion rates, shorter surgical times, less scarring, and shorter hospital stays.
“The endoscopic-assisted method offers advantages such as reduced blood transfusion rates, shorter surgical times, less scarring, and shorter hospital stays.”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 364
- Authors
- Jimenez, D. F., & Barone, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri Health System (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-81
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163854609
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- sagittal craniosynostosis, strip craniectomy, scaphocephaly, infants, operative time, blood loss
- MeSH terms
- Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, External Fixators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review