The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy
Abstract
Object. The authors tested the assumption that gamma knife radiosurgery is more effective than fractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with acromegaly who have undergone unsuccessful resective surgery. Untreated and uncured acromegaly causes illness and death. Acromegalic patients in whom growth hormone and, particularly, insulin-like growth factor I are not normalized must undergo further treatment. Methods. After unsuccessful operations, 16 patients suffering from recurrent and uncured acromegaly underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (25 Gy to the tumor margin, 50 Gy maximum), the outcome of which was compared with the result obtained in 50 patients who received fractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy). The cumulative distribution functions of the two groups (Kaplan—Meier estimate) differed significantly (p < 0.0001 in the log-rank test of Mantel). The mean time to simultaneous normalization of both parameters was 1.4 years in the group treated with the gamma knife and 7.1 years in the group treated with fractionated radiotherapy. Conclusions. The authors suggest the use of stereotactic radiosurgery as the preferred treatment for recurrent acromegaly resulting from unsuccessfully resected tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Lacroix, A., Feelders, R. A., Stratakis, C. A., & Nieman, L. K. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61375-1 · Cited by 1,777
A study on the radiation tolerance of the optic nerves and chiasm after stereotactic radiosurgery
Stafford, S. L., Pollock, B. E., Leavitt, J. A., Foote, R. L., Brown, P. D., Link, M. J., Gorman, D. A., & Schomberg, P. J. (2003) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04380-8 · Cited by 355
Thyrotropin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: Outcome of Pituitary Surgery and Irradiation
Malchiodi, E., Profka, E., Ferrante, E., Sala, E., Verrua, E., Campi, I., Lania, A. G., Arosio, M., Locatelli, M., Mortini, P., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-4376 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Landolt, A. M., Haller, D., Lomax, N., Scheib, S., Schubiger, O., Siegfried, J., & Wellis, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1002-1008
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133324612
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.1002
- The paper
- Landolt, A. M., Haller, D., Lomax, N., Scheib, S., Schubiger, O., Siegfried, J., & Wellis, G. (1998). Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.1002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.