Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury

Marshall, Lawrence F., Maas, Andrew I. R., Marshall, Sharon Bowers, Bricolo, Albino, Fearnside, Michael, Iannotti, Fausto, Klauber, Melville R., Lagarrigue, Jacques, Lobato, Ramiro, Persson, Lennart, Pickard, John D., Piek, Jürgen, Servadei, Franco, Wellis, Georgios N., Morris, Gabrielle F., Means, Eugene D., Musch, Bruno·1998·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object. The authors prospectively studied the efficacy of tirilazad mesylate, a novel aminosteroid, in humans with head injuries. Methods. A cohort of 1120 head-injured patients received at least one dose of study medication (tirilazad or placebo). Eighty-five percent (957) of the patients had suffered a severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 4–8) and 15% (163) had sustained a moderate head injury (GCS score 9–12). Six-month outcomes for the tirilazad- and placebo-treated groups for the Glasgow Outcome Scale categories of both good recovery and death showed no significant difference (good recovery in the tirilazad-treated group was 39% compared with the placebo group in which it was 42% [p = 0.461]; death in the tirilazad-treated group occurred in 26% of patients compared with the placebo group, in which it occurred in 25% [p = 0.750]). Subgroup analysis suggested that tirilazad mesylate may be effective in reducing mortality rates in males suffering from severe head injury with accompanying traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (death in the tirilazad-treated group occurred in 34% of patients; in the placebo group it occurred in 43% [p = 0.026]). No significant differences in frequency or types of serious adverse events were shown between the treatment and placebo groups. Conclusions. Striking problems with imbalance concerning basic prognostic variables were observed in spite of the large population studied. These imbalances concerned pretreatment hypotension, pretreatment hypoxia, and the incidence of epidural hematomas. In future trials of pharmacological therapy for severe head injury, serious consideration must be given to alternative randomization strategies. Given the heterogeneous nature of head injury and the identification of populations that do relatively well with standard therapy, target populations with a higher risk for mortality and morbidity may be more suitable for clinical trials of such agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0519

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, L. F., Maas, A. I. R., Marshall, S. B., Bricolo, A., Fearnside, M., Iannotti, F., Klauber, M. R., Lagarrigue, J., Lobato, R., Persson, L., Pickard, J. D., Piek, J., Servadei, F., Wellis, G. N., Morris, G. F., Means, E. D., & Musch, B.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1998-10
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
519-525
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104730217
Cited by
336
References
1
FWCI
17.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0519
The paper
Marshall, L. F., Maas, A. I. R., Marshall, S. B., Bricolo, A., Fearnside, M., Iannotti, F., Klauber, M. R., Lagarrigue, J., Lobato, R., Persson, L., Pickard, J. D., Piek, J., Servadei, F., Wellis, G. N., Morris, G. F., Means, E. D., & Musch, B. (1998). A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.