Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe

Vajkoczy, Peter, Roth, Harry, Horn, Peter, Lucke, Thomas, Thomé, Claudius, Hubner, Ulrich, Martin, Gregory T., Zappletal, Christina, Klar, Ernst, Schilling, Lothar, Schmiedek, Peter·2000·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object. Current clinical neuromonitoring techniques lack adequate surveillance of cerebral perfusion. In this article, a novel thermal diffusion (TD) microprobe is evaluated for the continuous and quantitative assessment of intraparenchymal regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Methods. To characterize the temporal resolution of this new technique, rCBF measured using the TD microprobe (TD-rCBF) was compared with rCBF levels measured by laser Doppler (LD) flowmetry during standardized variations of CBF in a sheep model. For validation of absolute values, the microprobe was implanted subcortically (20 mm below the level of dura) into 16 brain-injured patients, and TD-rCBF was compared with simultaneous rCBF measurements obtained using stable xenon-enhanced computerized tomography scanning (sXe-rCBF). The two techniques were compared using linear regression analysis as well as the Bland and Altman method. Stable TD-rCBF measurements could be obtained throughout all 3- to 5-hour sheep experiments. During hypercapnia, TD-rCBF increased from 49.3 ± 15.8 ml/100 g/min (mean ± standard deviation) to 119.6 ± 47.3 ml/100 g/min, whereas hypocapnia produced a decline in TD-rCBF from 51.2 ± 12.8 ml/100 g/min to 39.3 ± 5.6 ml/100 g/min. Variations in mean arterial blood pressure revealed an intact autoregulation with pressure limits of approximately 65 mm Hg and approximately 170 mm Hg. After cardiac arrest TD-rCBF declined rapidly to 0 ml/100 g/min. The dynamics of changes in TD-rCBF corresponded well to the dynamics of the LD readings. A comparison of TD-rCBF and sXe-rCBF revealed a good correlation (r = 0.89; p <0.0001) and a mean difference of 1.1 ± 5.2 ml/100 g/min between the two techniques. Conclusions. The novel TD microprobe provides a sensitive, continuous, and real-time assessment of intraparenchymal rCBF in absolute flow values that are in good agreement with sXe-rCBF measurements. This study provides the basis for the integration of TD-rCBF into multimodal monitoring of patients who are at risk for secondary brain injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0265

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Vajkoczy, P., Roth, H., Horn, P., Lucke, T., Thomé, C., Hubner, U., Martin, G. T., Zappletal, C., Klar, E., Schilling, L., & Schmiedek, P.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2000-08
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
265-274
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035331998
Cited by
229
References
1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0265
The paper
Vajkoczy, P., Roth, H., Horn, P., Lucke, T., Thomé, C., Hubner, U., Martin, G. T., Zappletal, C., Klar, E., Schilling, L., & Schmiedek, P. (2000). Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0265

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.