The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe
Abstract
Object. Current clinical neuromonitoring techniques lack adequate surveillance of cerebral perfusion. In this article, a novel thermal diffusion (TD) microprobe is evaluated for the continuous and quantitative assessment of intraparenchymal regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Methods. To characterize the temporal resolution of this new technique, rCBF measured using the TD microprobe (TD-rCBF) was compared with rCBF levels measured by laser Doppler (LD) flowmetry during standardized variations of CBF in a sheep model. For validation of absolute values, the microprobe was implanted subcortically (20 mm below the level of dura) into 16 brain-injured patients, and TD-rCBF was compared with simultaneous rCBF measurements obtained using stable xenon-enhanced computerized tomography scanning (sXe-rCBF). The two techniques were compared using linear regression analysis as well as the Bland and Altman method. Stable TD-rCBF measurements could be obtained throughout all 3- to 5-hour sheep experiments. During hypercapnia, TD-rCBF increased from 49.3 ± 15.8 ml/100 g/min (mean ± standard deviation) to 119.6 ± 47.3 ml/100 g/min, whereas hypocapnia produced a decline in TD-rCBF from 51.2 ± 12.8 ml/100 g/min to 39.3 ± 5.6 ml/100 g/min. Variations in mean arterial blood pressure revealed an intact autoregulation with pressure limits of approximately 65 mm Hg and approximately 170 mm Hg. After cardiac arrest TD-rCBF declined rapidly to 0 ml/100 g/min. The dynamics of changes in TD-rCBF corresponded well to the dynamics of the LD readings. A comparison of TD-rCBF and sXe-rCBF revealed a good correlation (r = 0.89; p <0.0001) and a mean difference of 1.1 ± 5.2 ml/100 g/min between the two techniques. Conclusions. The novel TD microprobe provides a sensitive, continuous, and real-time assessment of intraparenchymal rCBF in absolute flow values that are in good agreement with sXe-rCBF measurements. This study provides the basis for the integration of TD-rCBF into multimodal monitoring of patients who are at risk for secondary brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults
Maas, A. I., Stocchetti, N., & Bullock, R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70164-9 · Cited by 2,123
Kim, M. N., Durduran, T., Frangos, S., Edlow, B. L., Buckley, E. M., Moss, H. E., Zhou, C., Yu, G., Choe, R., Maloney-Wilensky, E., et al. (2010) · Neurocritical Care · doi:10.1007/s12028-009-9305-x · Cited by 306
Bouzat, P., Sala, N., Payen, J.-F., & Oddo, M. (2013) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/2110-5820-3-23 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Vajkoczy, P., Roth, H., Horn, P., Lucke, T., Thomé, C., Hubner, U., Martin, G. T., Zappletal, C., Klar, E., Schilling, L., & Schmiedek, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-274
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035331998
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0265
- The paper
- Vajkoczy, P., Roth, H., Horn, P., Lucke, T., Thomé, C., Hubner, U., Martin, G. T., Zappletal, C., Klar, E., Schilling, L., & Schmiedek, P. (2000). Continuous monitoring of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.