Intracerebral microdialysis in neurointensive care: the use of urea as an endogenous reference compound
Abstract
Object When evaluating the results of intracerebral microdialysis, the in vivo performance of the microdialysis probe must be considered, because this determines the fraction of the interstitial concentration obtained in the microdialysis samples. The in vivo performance is dependent on several factors, for example, the interstitial compartment's diffusion characteristics, which may vary during the course of the acute brain injury process. In the present study the authors investigated the method of controlling the in vivo performance by using urea, which is evenly distributed in all body fluid compartments, as an endogenous reference compound and by comparing the urea levels in three compartments: the brain (CNS), abdominal subcutaneous tissue (SC), and blood serum (BS). Methods Sixty-nine patients with traumatic brain injury or cerebrovascular disease were included in the study. In 63 of these patients a CNS probe was used, an SC probe was used in 40, and both were used in 34. Urea was measured by enzymatic methods, at bedside for the microdialysis samples and in routine clinical laboratory studies for the BS samples, with the probe calibrated to give identical results. The correlation coefficient for CNS/SC urea was 0.88 (2414 samples), for CNS/BS urea it was 0.89 (180 samples), and for SC/BS urea it was 0.98 (112 samples). Conclusions Urea levels in the CNS, SC, and BS were highly correlated, which supports the assumption that urea is evenly distributed. The CNS/SC urea ra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Urea has been utilized as an independent measure of probe function and recovery in both human and animal brain microdialysis studies.
“Since the metabolite urea has been utilized as an independent measure of probe function and recovery in both human and animal brain microdialysis studies (34-37)”
From Human ApoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-β peptide clearance (2011) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human ApoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-β peptide clearance
Castellano, J. M., Kim, J., Stewart, F. R., Jiang, H., DeMattos, R. B., Patterson, B. W., Fagan, A. M., Morris, J. C., Mawuenyega, K. G., Cruchaga, C., et al. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002156 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
“Since the metabolite urea has been utilized as an independent measure of probe function and recovery in both human and animal brain microdialysis studies (34-37), we measured the concentration of urea in the brain ISF of PDAPP/TRE mice.”
Amyloid-β Dynamics Correlate with Neurological Status in the Injured Human Brain
Brody, D. L., Magnoni, S., Schwetye, K. E., Spinner, M. L., Esparza, T. J., Stocchetti, N., Zipfel, G. J., & Holtzman, D. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161591 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Fu, M. S., Coelho, C., De Leon-Rodriguez, C. M., Rossi, D. C. P., Camacho, E., Jung, E. H., Kulkarni, M., & Casadevall, A. (2018) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007144 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Factors Required for Activation of Urease as a Virulence Determinant in Cryptococcus neoformans
Singh, A., Panting, R. J., Varma, A., Saijo, T., Waldron, K. J., Jong, A., Ngamskulrungroj, P., Chang, Y. C., Rutherford, J. C., & Kwon-Chung, K. J. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00220-13 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ronne-Engström, E., Cesarini, K. G., Enblad, P., Hesselager, G., Marklund, N., Nilsson, P., Salci, K., Persson, L., & Hillered, L.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013003446
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hjärnfonden
- Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- intracerebral microdialysis, urea, interstitial space, traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular disease, neurocritical care, probe calibration
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aged, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Body Fluid Compartments, Brain Chemistry, Brain Injuries, Brain Ischemia, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Reference Standards, Urea, Linear Models, Microdialysis, Point-of-Care Systems, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Traumatic, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review