The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery from mild concussion in high school athletes
Abstract
Object. A computerized neuropsychological test battery was conducted to evaluate memory dysfunction and self-reporting of symptoms in a group of high school athletes who had suffered concussion. Methods. Neuropsychological performance prior to and following concussion was compared with the test performance of an age-matched control group. Potentially important diagnostic markers of concussion severity are discussed and linked to recovery within the 1st week of injury. Conclusions. High school athletes who had suffered mild concussion demonstrated significant declines in memory processes relative to a noninjured control group. Statistically significant differences between preseason and postinjury memory test results were still evident in the concussion group at 4 and 7 days postinjury. Self-reported neurological symptoms such as headache, dizziness, and nausea resolved by Day 4. Duration of on-field mental status changes such as retrograde amnesia and posttraumatic confusion was related to the presence of memory impairment at 36 hours and 4 and 7 days post-injury and was also related to slower resolution of self-reported symptoms. The results of this study suggest that caution should be exercised in returning high school athletes to the playing field following concussion. On-field mental status changes appear to have prognostic utility and should be taken into account when making return-to-play decisions following concussion. Athletes who exhibit on-field mental status changes for more than 5 minutes have longer-lasting postconcussion symptoms and memory decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurology (1997) · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.3.581 · Cited by 678
Cantu, R. C. (1998) · Clinics in Sports Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70059-4 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Cited by
Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review
Iverson, G. L., Gardner, A. J., Terry, D. P., Ponsford, J. L., Sills, A. K., Broshek, D. K., & Solomon, G. S. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097729 · Cited by 917
Self-citationSport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents
Halstead, M. E., Walter, K. D., & The Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2005 · Cited by 628
Bazarian, J. J., Zhong, J., Blyth, B., Zhu, T., Kavcic, V., & Peterson, D. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0241 · Cited by 487
The Relationship between Neurocognitive Function and Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Swanik, C. B., Covassin, T., Stearne, D. J., & Schatz, P. (2007) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546507299532 · Cited by 343
The value added of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion
Van Kampen, D. A., Lovell, M. R., Pardini, J. E., Collins, M. W., & Fu, F. H. (2006) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506288677 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovell, M. R., Collins, M. W., Iverson, G. L., Field, M., Maroon, J. C., Cantu, R., Podell, K., Powell, J. W., Belza, M., & Fu, F. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-301
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021303167
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.