Cited by 90Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeurology and Historical StudiesHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere: An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients

Ojemann, George, Ojemann, Jeff, Lettich, E., Berger, M.·2008·Journal of neurosurgery

Abstract

The localization of cortical sites essential for language was assessed by stimulation mapping in the left, dominant hemispheres of 117 patients. Sites were related to language when stimulation at a current below the threshold for afterdischarge evoked repeated statistically significant errors in object naming. The language center was highly localized in many patients to form several mosaics of 1 to 2 sq cm, usually one in the frontal and one or more in the temporoparietal lobe. The area of individual mosaics, and the total area related to language was usually much smaller than the traditional Broca-Wernicke areas. There was substantial individual variability in the exact location of language function, some of which correlated with the patient's sex and verbal intelligence. These features were present for patients as young as 4 years and as old as 80 years, and for those with lesions acquired in early life or adulthood. These findings indicate a need for revision of the classical model of language localization. The combination of discrete localization in individual patients but substantial individual variability between patients also has major clinical implications for cortical resections of the dominant hemisphere, for it means that language cannot be reliably localized on anatomic criteria alone. A maximal resection with minimal risk of postoperative aphasia requires individual localization of language with a technique like stimulation mapping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns/2008/108/2/0411

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ojemann, G., Ojemann, J., Lettich, E., & Berger, M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of neurosurgery
Published
2008-02
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W4233350830
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (21724, 20842)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17111)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
language mapping, electrical stimulation mapping, left hemisphere, dominant hemisphere, Broca's area, Wernicke's area, interindividual variability, object naming, frontal lobe, surgical resection planning, sex differences, verbal intelligence
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Language, Neurophysiology, History, 20th Century, Cerebrum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review