The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery
Abstract
Object. The objective of this study was to identify specific independent risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) occurring after laminectomy or spinal fusion. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective case-control study of data obtained in patients between 1996 and 1999 who had undergone laminectomy and/or spinal fusion. Forty-one patients with SSI or meningitis were identified, and data were compared with those acquired in 178 uninfected control patients. Risk factors for SSI were determined using univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. The spinal surgery—related SSI rate (incisional and organ space) during the 4-year study period was 2.8%. Independent risk factors for SSI identified by multivariate analysis were postoperative incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 8.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–22.8), posterior approach (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2–33.5), procedure for tumor resection (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.7–22.3), and morbid obesity (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.9–14.2). In patients with SSI the postoperative hospital length of stay was significantly longer than that in uninfected patients (median 6 and 3 days, respectively; p < 0.001) and were readmitted to the hospital for a median additional 6 days for treatment of their infection. Repeated surgery due to the infection was required in the majority (73%) of infected patients. Conclusions. Postoperative incontinence, posterior approach, surgery for tumor resection, and morbid obesity were independent risk factors predictive of SSI following spinal surgery. Interventions to reduce the risk for these potentially devastating infections need to be developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Cited by
Kwon, S., Thompson, R., Dellinger, P., Yanez, D., Farrohki, E., & Flum, D. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b6bbc · Cited by 598
Veeravagu, A., Patil, C. G., Lad, S. P., & Boakye, M. (2009) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181adc989 · Cited by 270
van Dielen, F. M. H., Buurman, W. A., Hadfoune, M., Nijhuis, J., & Greve, J. W. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-032125 · Cited by 158
Assessing surgical site infection risk factors using electronic medical records and text mining
Michelson, J. D., Pariseau, J. S., & Paganelli, W. C. (2014) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.007 · Cited by 25
Case-control studies in neurosurgery: A review
Nesvick, C. L., Thompson, C. J., Boop, F. A., & Klimo, P. (2014) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.5.jns132329 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, M. A., Mayfield, J., Lauryssen, C., Polish, L. B., Jones, M., Vest, J., & Fraser, V. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-155
- ISSN
- 1547-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5654
- OpenAlex
- W1976875832
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0149
- The paper
- Olsen, M. A., Mayfield, J., Lauryssen, C., Polish, L. B., Jones, M., Vest, J., & Fraser, V. J. (2003). Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.