Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery

Olsen, Margaret A., Mayfield, Jennie, Lauryssen, Carl, Polish, Louis B., Jones, Marilyn, Vest, Joshua, Fraser, Victoria J.·2003·Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Abstract

Object. The objective of this study was to identify specific independent risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) occurring after laminectomy or spinal fusion. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective case-control study of data obtained in patients between 1996 and 1999 who had undergone laminectomy and/or spinal fusion. Forty-one patients with SSI or meningitis were identified, and data were compared with those acquired in 178 uninfected control patients. Risk factors for SSI were determined using univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. The spinal surgery—related SSI rate (incisional and organ space) during the 4-year study period was 2.8%. Independent risk factors for SSI identified by multivariate analysis were postoperative incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 8.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–22.8), posterior approach (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2–33.5), procedure for tumor resection (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.7–22.3), and morbid obesity (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.9–14.2). In patients with SSI the postoperative hospital length of stay was significantly longer than that in uninfected patients (median 6 and 3 days, respectively; p < 0.001) and were readmitted to the hospital for a median additional 6 days for treatment of their infection. Repeated surgery due to the infection was required in the majority (73%) of infected patients. Conclusions. Postoperative incontinence, posterior approach, surgery for tumor resection, and morbid obesity were independent risk factors predictive of SSI following spinal surgery. Interventions to reduce the risk for these potentially devastating infections need to be developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0149

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Olsen, M. A., Mayfield, J., Lauryssen, C., Polish, L. B., Jones, M., Vest, J., & Fraser, V. J.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Published
2003-03
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
  • 1547-5646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-5654
OpenAlex
W1976875832
Cited by
468
References
2
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0149
The paper
Olsen, M. A., Mayfield, J., Lauryssen, C., Polish, L. B., Jones, M., Vest, J., & Fraser, V. J. (2003). Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.