The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein
Abstract
Object. The authors reviewed clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who had undergone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) involving the placement of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers filled with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)—2. Methods. Data obtained in 24 cases were retrospectively evaluated. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 16 months (mean 13 months). Fifteen patients presented with radiculopathy, eight with myeloradiculopathy, and one with quadriparesis. Single-level ACDF was performed in 12 patients, two-level ACDF in nine, and three-level ACDF in three. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Odom criteria, and fusion was assessed by examining flexion—extension radiographs and computerized tomography scans in cases in which arthrodesis was questionable. Follow-up data were available for 23 patients. One patient died of medical complications unrelated to surgery 4 weeks after ACDF. Clinical outcomes were rated as good/excellent in 22 patients (95%) and fair in one (5%). Solid radiographically documented fusion, with evidence of solid bridging bone and no instability on flexion—extension x-ray films, was present in all cases. Complications included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in one case, transient C-5 paresis in one, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in one, and transient dysphagia in two. Conclusions. Analysis of the results indicated that ACDF involving an rhBMP-2—filled PEEK spacer leads to good clinical outcomes (by Odum criteria) and solid fusion (even in multilevel cases) while avoiding the complications associated with harvesting iliac crest bone grafts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
James, A. W., LaChaud, G., Shen, J., Asatrian, G., Nguyen, V., Zhang, X., Ting, K., & Soo, C. (2016) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0357 · Cited by 1,131
Mummaneni, P. V., Burkus, J. K., Haid, R. W., Traynelis, V. C., & Zdeblick, T. A. (2007) · Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine · doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198 · Cited by 614
Self-citationHuddleston, P. M. (2007) · Yearbook of Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/s0276-1092(08)70233-5 · Cited by 334
Off-Label Use of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in the United States Using Administrative Data
Ong, K. L., Villarraga, M. L., Lau, E., Carreon, L. Y., Kurtz, S. M., & Glassman, S. D. (2010) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181ecf6e4 · Cited by 290
Formulation, Delivery and Stability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Effective Bone Regeneration
El Bialy, I., Jiskoot, W., & Reza Nejadnik, M. (2017) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2147-x · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Boakye, M., Mummaneni, P. V., Garrett, M., Rodts, G., & Haid, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-525
- ISSN
- 1547-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5654
- OpenAlex
- W2154128099
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0521
- The paper
- Boakye, M., Mummaneni, P. V., Garrett, M., Rodts, G., & Haid, R. (2005). Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.