Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age and outcome following traumatic coma: why do older patients fare worse?

Vollmer, Dennis G., Torner, James C., Jane, John A., Sadovnic, Barbara, Charlebois, Deborah, Eisenberg, Howard M., Foulkes, Mary A., Marmarou, Anthony, Marshall, Lawrence F.·1991·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ To better understand the relationship between patient age and clinical outcome following traumatic coma, the data for 661 patients, aged 15 years or older at the time of receiving a nonpenetrating head injury, were analyzed. All patients were prospectively followed and the information was entered into the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. This information was statistically analyzed to determine trends and interactions between patient age and other prognostic indicators. Older patients had higher rates of mortality overall; vegetative survival was seen in 4.8% to 8.0% of patients and did not exhibit a trend related to age. Injury severity, as assessed by motor score or Glasgow Coma Scale score, did not significantly differ according to age. The injury mechanism was age-related, with a greater frequency of falls and pedestrian accidents in older patients. Multiple injury was less frequent in older patients. Medical complications and systemic trauma were considered to be the primary cause of death in less than 25% of patients, with the exception of those between 45 and 55 years of age. When the data were studied in univariate fashion, no factor was identified that accounts for the adverse effect of age on head-injury outcome. Multivariate logistic regression, performed to assess the combined effect of multiple variables on outcome, failed to eliminate patient age as an independent predictor. Based upon this analysis, it is likely that the effect of age on outcome following head injury is dependent upon an alteration in the pathophysiological response of the aging central nervous system to severe trauma and not an increased incidence of non-neurological complications or other clinical parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/sup.1991.75.1s.0s37

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Vollmer, D. G., Torner, J. C., Jane, J. A., Sadovnic, B., Charlebois, D., Eisenberg, H. M., Foulkes, M. A., Marmarou, A., & Marshall, L. F.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1991-11
Volume
75
Issue
Supplement
Pages
S37-S49
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1513534922
Cited by
291
References
2
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.