Cited by 63Cerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

“Giant” Arachnoid Granulations Just Like CSF?: NOT!!

Open access
Trimble, C.R., Harnsberger, H.R., Castillo, M., Brant-Zawadzki, M., Osborn, A.G.·2010·American Journal of Neuroradiology

Abstract

"Giant" AGs (>1 cm) are uncommon and can be misdiagnosed as venous sinus pathology such as a neoplasm or thrombosis. Seventeen patients with a total of 19 venous sinus AGs of >1 cm were collected from contributing authors. MR imaging was available for all AGs; CT, for 5/19; and DSA, for 7/19. Intra-AG fluid was compared with CSF in subarachnoid spaces. Nonfluid AG tissue was compared with gray matter. Diagnosis was based on imaging findings. Fluid within giant AGs did not follow CSF signal intensity on at least 1 MR image in nearly 80% (15/19) of AGs. Nine of these 15 AGs had CSF-incongruent signal intensity on ≥2 MR images. CSF-incongruent signal intensity was seen in 8/8 AGs on FLAIR, 7/10 on precontrast T1WI, 13/19 on T2WI, and 8/14 on contrast-enhanced T1WI. Nonfluid signal intensity was present in 18/19 AGs and varied from absent/hypointense (intra-AG flow voids) to gray matter isointense (stromal tissue).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3174/ajnr.a2157

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent of enhancing tissue within parasagittal dura does not resemble previously reported appearance of true dural lymphatic vessels (tubular-shaped, sub-millimeter, near venous sinus wall) nor classical MRI appearance of arachnoid granulations bulging into venous sinuses.

    “The extent of enhancing tissue within parasagittal dura does not resemble the previously reported appearance of true dural lymphatic vessels, which are tubular-shaped structures of sub-millimeter cross-sectional diameter near the venous sinus wall3,4,11, and also far from the classical MRI appearance of arachnoid granulations bulging into venous sinuses12.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trimble, C. R., Harnsberger, H. R., Castillo, M., Brant-Zawadzki, M., & Osborn, A. G.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Trimble, C.R.
Venue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
1724-1728
ISSN
  • 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-959X
OpenAlex
W2168074220
Cited by
63
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid signal intensity, flow voids, misdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Cranial Sinuses, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial, Observer Variation, Arachnoid Cysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review