The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Flow-Diverter Embolization Device: A Single-Center Experience with Long-Term Follow-Up Results
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diverting devices now offer a new treatment alternative for cerebral aneurysms. We present the results of a large single-center series of patients treated with the PED, including long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2008 and September 2011, sidewall aneurysms with a wide neck (≥4 mm) or unfavorable dome-neck ratio (≤1.5); large/giant, fusiform, dissecting, blister-like, and recurrent sidewall aneurysms; aneurysms at difficult angles; and aneurysms in which a branch was originating directly from the sac were treated with the PED. Patients were premedicated with dual antiplatelet medications. Data, including demographics, aneurysm features, clinical presentation, complications, results, and follow-up information, for up to 2 years are presented. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one aneurysms in 191 patients were treated. Of these, 96 (38.3%) were large or giant (≥10 mm). In 34/251 (13.5%), PEDs were used for retreatment. Adjunctive coiling was performed in 11 aneurysms (2.1%). The mean number of devices per aneurysm was 1.3. One aneurysm ruptured in the fourth month posttreatment (0.5%), and symptomatic in-construct stenosis was detected in 1 patient (0.5%) treated with percutaneous transarterial angioplasty. Any event rate was 27/191 (14.1%), with a permanent morbidity of 1% and mortality of 0.5%. Control angiography was available in 182 (95.3%) patients with 239 (95.2%) aneurysms. In 121 aneurysms (48.2%), 1- to 2-year control angiography was available. The aneurysm occlusion rate was 91.2% in 6 months, increasing to 94.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the PED is safe, efficacious, and durable in cerebral aneurysm treatment, with low morbidity-mortality and high occlusion rates as confirmed with mid- to long-term control angiography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferns, S. P., Sprengers, M. E. S., van Rooij, W. J., Rinkel, G. J. E., van Rijn, J. C., Bipat, S., Sluzewski, M., & Majoie, C. B. L. M. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.553099 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Becske, T., Brinjikji, W., Potts, M. B., Kallmes, D. F., Shapiro, M., Moran, C. J., Levy, E. I., McDougall, C. G., Szikora, I., Lanzino, G., et al. (2017) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 · Cited by 447
Self-citationChalouhi, N., Jabbour, P., Singhal, S., Drueding, R., Starke, R. M., Dalyai, R. T., Tjoumakaris, S., Gonzalez, L. F., Dumont, A. S., Rosenwasser, R., et al. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.000641 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Saatci, I., Yavuz, K., Ozer, C., Geyik, S., & Cekirge, H. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1436-1446
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- OpenAlex
- W2097182508
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.