Structural and Volumetric Brain MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Routine MR imaging findings are frequently normal following mild traumatic brain injury and have a limited role in diagnosis and management. Advanced MR imaging can assist in detecting pathology and prognostication but is not readily available outside research settings. However, 3D isotropic sequences with ∼1-mm3 voxel size are available on community MR imaging scanners. Using such sequences, we compared radiologists’ findings and quantified regional brain volumes between a mild traumatic brain injury cohort and non-brain-injured controls to describe structural imaging findings associated with mild traumatic brain injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one military personnel with persistent symptoms and 75 controls underwent 3T MR imaging. Three neuroradiologists interpreted the scans using common data elements. FreeSurfer was used to quantify regional gray and white matter volumes. RESULTS: WM hyperintensities were seen in 81% of the brain-injured group versus 60% of healthy controls. The odds of ≥1 WM hyperintensity in the brain-injured group was about 3.5 times the odds for healthy controls (95% CI, 1.58–7.72; P = .002) after adjustment for age. A frontal lobe-only distribution of WM hyperintensities was more commonly seen in the mild traumatic brain injury cohort. Furthermore, 7 gray matter, 1 white matter, and 2 subcortical gray matter regions demonstrated decreased volumes in the brain-injured group after multiple-comparison correction. The mild traumatic brain injury cohort showed regional parenchymal volume loss. CONCLUSIONS: White matter findings are nonspecific and therefore a clinical challenge. Our results suggest that prior trauma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of multifocal white matter abnormalities with a clinical history of mild traumatic brain injury, particularly when a frontal predilection is observed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mTBI, thinning of the right VMPFC is evident when compared to healthy controls.
“In mTBI, thinning of the right VMPFC is evident when compared to healthy controls [78].”
From Frontal Pole Neuromodulation for Impulsivity and Suicidality in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Common Co-Occurring Mental Health Conditions: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
The Volumetric Comparisons section reports significantly smaller right medial orbitofrontal cortical volume in the mTBI group than in healthy controls. The Discussion distinguishes that finding from cortical thinning: it attributes thinning of the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex to an earlier study, not to this paper's measurements. The cited paper therefore supports a regional volume difference, but not the claimed right VMPFC thinning. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe 72-hour spacing between iTBS completion and posttreatment imaging is long enough not to represent the immediate effects of the most recent stimulation.
“This time spacing between stimulation and imaging has been done in similar studies [78] and is thought to be a long enough gap post-iTBS completion not to represent the immediate effects of the most recent stimulation.”
From Frontal Pole Neuromodulation for Impulsivity and Suicidality in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Common Co-Occurring Mental Health Conditions: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
The Abstract describes an analysis of baseline structural MRI findings in a mild traumatic brain injury study, and the MR Imaging Protocol describes how scans were acquired. Neither passage addresses iTBS, a 72-hour interval after stimulation, or whether that interval excludes immediate effects; searches for those terms and for treatment-to-imaging timing found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Nelson, L. D., Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S., Barber, J., Giacino, J. T., Yuh, E., Levin, H. S., McCrea, M. A., Stein, M. B., Mukherjee, P., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury- Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths: United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017; 66:1-16 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- McMahon P, Hricik A, Yue JK, et al. Symptomatology and func- tional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:26- 33 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Shetty VS, Reis MN, Aulino JM, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma. J Am Coll Radiology 2016;13:668-79 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Wu X, Kirov II, Gonen O, et al. MR imaging applications in mild trau- matic brain injury: an imaging update. Radiology 2016;279:693-707 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Reneman L, de Win MM, Booij J, et al. Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clini- cal implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1971-74 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Riedy G, Senseney JS, Liu W, et al. Findings from structural MR imag- ing in military traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2016;279:207-15 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Orrison WW, Hanson EH, Alamo T, et al. Traumatic brain injury: a review and high-field MRI findings in 100 unarmed combatants using a literature-based checklist approach. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:689-701 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Tate DF, Gusman M, Kini J, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging and white matter abnormality findings in service members with persistent cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. Mil Med 2017;182:e1651-58 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmentation: auto- mated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341-55 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou Y, Kierans A, Kenul D, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury: lon- gitudinal regional brain volume changes. Radiology 2013;267:880- 90 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Weaver LK, Wilson SH, Lindblad AS, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for post-concussive symptoms in United States military service members: a randomized clinical trial. Undersea Hyperb Med 2018;45:129-56 Medline
- Weaver LK, Wilson SH, Lindblad AS, et al; NORMAL Study Team. Comprehensive evaluation of healthy volunteers using multi-mo- dality brain injury assessments: an exploratory, observational study. Front Neurol 2018;9:1030 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Corrigan JD, Bogner J. Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2007;22:318-29 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Weaver LK, Chhoeu AH, Lindblad AS, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for mild traumatic brain injury: design and baseline summary. Undersea Hyperb Med 2016;43:489-508 Medline
- Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:205-16 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Grinnon ST, Miller K, Marler JR, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project: approach and methods. Clin Trials 2012;9:322-29 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Brandstack N, Kurki T, Tenovuo O, et al. MR imaging of head trauma: visibility of contusions and other intraparenchymal injuries in early and late stage. Brain Inj 2006;20:409-16 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Segonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 2004;22:1060-75 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Fischl B, Salat DH, van der Kouwe AJ, et al. Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2004;23 (Suppl 1):S69-84 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87-97 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Fischl B, Liu A, Dale AM. Automated manifold surgery: construct- ing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:70-80 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Segonne F, Pacheco J, Fischl B. Geometrically accurate topology- correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:518-29 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis, I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179- 94 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Dale AM, Sereno MI. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruc- tion: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 1993;5:162-76 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:11050-55 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979;6:65-70
- Weaver LK, Churchill S, Wilson SH, et al. A composite outcome for mild traumatic brain injury in trials of hyperbaric oxygen. Undersea Hyperb Med 2019;46:341-52 Medline
- Akiyama Y, Miyata K, Harada K, et al. Susceptibility-weighted mag- netic resonance imaging for the detection of cerebral microhemor- rhage in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009;49:97-99; discussion 99 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Bumb JM, Brockmann MA, Groden C, et al. TrueFISP of the pediat- ric pineal gland: volumetric and microstructural analysis. Clin Neuroradiol 2012;22:69-77 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Nolte I, Brockmann MA, Gerigk L, et al. TrueFISP imaging of the pineal gland: more cysts and more abnormalities. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010;112:204-08 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Dean PJ, Sato JR, Vieira G, et al. Long-term structural changes after mTBI and their relation to post-concussion symptoms. Brain Inj 2015;29:1211-18 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Spitz G, Bigler ED, Abildskov T, et al. Regional cortical volume and cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn 2013;83:34-44 CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Burrowes SA, Rhodes CS, Meeker TJ, et al. Decreased grey matter volume in mTBI patients with post-traumatic headache compared to headache-free mTBI patients and healthy controls: a longitudi- nal MRI study. Brain Imaging Behav 2019 Apr 12. [Epub ahead of print] CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Epstein DJ, Legarreta M, Bueler E, et al. Orbitofrontal cortical thin- ning and aggression in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Behav 2016;6:e00581 CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nelson, L. D., Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S., Barber, J., Giacino, J. T., Yuh, E., Levin, H. S., McCrea, M. A., Stein, M. B., Mukherjee, P., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Bernanke, A., Hasley, R., Sabetfakhri, N., de Wit, H., Smith, B. M., Wang, L., Brenner, L. A., Hanlon, C., Philip, N. S., Ajilore, O., et al. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/58206 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patel, J. B., Wilson, S. H., Oakes, T. R., Santhanam, P., & Weaver, L. K.
- Affiliations
- Lovelace Medical Center (US)
- Emmes (United States) (US)
- University of Wisconsin System (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-99
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- PMC
- PMC6975320
- OpenAlex
- W2997512322
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- American Journal of Neuroradiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (W81XWH-15-D-0039-0003)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, white matter hyperintensities, gray matter volume, white matter volume, frontal lobe, persistent post-concussion symptoms, military personnel
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Concussion, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Military Personnel, Cohort Studies, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, White Matter, Gray Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review