Cited by 37CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

MINERAL TRAPPING OF CO2 VIA OIL SHALE ASH AQUEOUS CARBONATION: CONTROLLING MECHANISM OF PROCESS RATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CONTINUOUS-FLOW REACTOR SYSTEM; pp. 40–58

Open access
UIBU, M., KUUSIK, R.·2009·Oil Shale

Abstract

Ash containing considerable amounts of free lime as the most active compo­nent requires stabilization to assure safe landfilling. Using CO2 from flue gases as a neutralizing agent, also the emission of CO2 is diminished. The most extensive effect could be achieved by treating ash-water suspensions with CO2-contain­ing gas. As even minute amounts of extraneous substances present in water influence the extent and rate of lime solubility in water, the behavior of lime as the key component of ash in various conditions was studied and the mechanism of process deceleration was proposed. As the next step, a laboratory-scale continuous-flow reactor system for aqueous carbona­tion of oil shale ash and main considerations for industrial pilot-scale plant design were developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3176/oil.2009.1.06

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intensive chemical reactions like slaking and carbonation of lime trigger reaction heat and internal expansive forces cause ash particles to fracture and disintegrate, creating more favorable conditions for deeper carbonation of ash (including carbonation of Ca-Mg-silicates).

    “Intensive chemical reactions like slaking and carbonation of lime trigger reaction heat and the internal expansive forces cause ash particles to fracture and disintegrate [21], creating thereby more favorable conditions for deeper carbonation of ash (including carbonation of Ca-Mg-silicates).”

    From The CO2-binding by Ca-Mg-silicates in direct aqueous carbonation of oil shale ash and steel slag (2011) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Teir, S. Reduction of CO 2 emissions by producing calcium carbonates from calcium silicates and steelmaking slags. Thesis of Licentiate in Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 2006.
  2. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Intergovern- mental Panel of Climate Change -Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 2005; 443 p.
  3. Lackner, K. S. Carbonate chemistry for sequestrating fossil carbon // Annual Review of Energy and Environment. 2002. Vol. 27. P. 193-232.
  4. Kodama, S., Nishimoto, T., Yogo, K., Yamada, K. Design and evaluation of a new CO 2 fixation process using alkaline-earth metal wastes // Proc. 8-th International Conference of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 19-22 June, 2006; Elsevier Ltd.: Trondheim, Norway, 2006; 5 p. [CD-ROM].
  5. Kuusik, R., Veskimäe, H., Uibu, M. Carbon dioxide binding in the heterogeneus systems formed at combustion of oil shale. 3. Transformations in the system suspension of ash -flue gases // Oil Shale. 2002. Vol. 19, No. 3. P. 277-288.
  6. Kuusik, R., Uibu, M., Kirsimäe, K. Characterization of oil shale ashes formed at industrial-scale boilers // Oil Shale. 2005. Vol. 22, No. 4 Special. P. 407-420.
  7. Domingo, C., Loste, E., Gomez-Morales, J., Garcia-Carmona, J. Calcite pre- cipitation by high-pressure CO 2 carbonation route // J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2006. Vol. 36, No. 3. P: 202-215.
  8. Xu, B.-A., Giles, D. E., Ritchie, I. M. Reaction of lime with carbonate containing solutions // Hydrometallurgy. 1998. Vol. 48, No. 2. P. 205-224.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
UIBU, M., & KUUSIK, R.
Affiliations
Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
Venue
Oil Shale
Published
2009-03-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
40-58
ISSN
0208-189X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135349424
Cited by
37
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oil Shale (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, oil shale ash, aqueous carbonation, free lime, flue gas CO2, ash stabilization, continuous flow reactor, CO2 emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review