Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radioimmunoassay for Rat Prolactin

Niswender, G. D., Chen, C. L., Midgley, A. R., Meites, J., Ellis, S.·1969·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The most commonly used method for measuring prolactin in biological samples has been the pigeon crop bioassay of Lyons (1). It is possible with this method to estimate the prolactin content of pituitary preparations and of other tissues containing relatively high concentrations of this hormone (a minimum of about 0.03 IU or 2 μg of NIH-P-B1, 13 IU/mg); however, it was not possible to assay the prolactin present in serum from normal animals. Recently, double antibody radioimmunoassay techniques have been developed for ovine (2) and bovine prolactin (3) and a radioimmunoassay for rat prolactin (4) which uses a chromatoelectrophoresis step to separate free prolactin-125 I from that bound to the antibody has also been reported. These techniques are sufficiently sensitive to quantitate serum levels of prolactin. This communication describes the development of a double antibody radioimmunoassay for rat prolactin capable of measuring the amount of prolactin in 100 μl of serum from immature female rats or in 25 μl of serum from normal females during diestrus. Methods and Materials. Purified rat prolactin (HIV-8-C) for radioiodination and for immunization was prepared from whole, frozen rat pituitary glands by Ellis et al. (5). This preparation is designated B329 in the remainder of the present study. Other preparations with differing concentrations of rat prolactin were obtained by physiologic manipulation of three groups of mature, female Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats in the first group (B350) were ovariectomized and injected subcutaneously with 10 μg of estradiol benzoate in corn oil daily for 10 days. Rats in the second group (B349) were ovariectomized and injected with corn oil for 10 days while the third group was composed of untreated intact females during diestrus (B351). At the end of 2 weeks the rats were bled terminally via the abdominal vena cava, and the blood from each group was pooled and serum was obtained by centrifugation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3181/00379727-130-33657

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Niswender, G. D., Chen, C. L., Midgley, A. R., Meites, J., & Ellis, S.
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
1969-03-01
Volume
130
Issue
3
Pages
793-797
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W2062532405
Cited by
360
References
0
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radioimmunoassay for Rat Prolactin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3181/00379727-130-33657
The paper
Niswender, G. D., Chen, C. L., Midgley, A. R., Meites, J., & Ellis, S. (1969). Radioimmunoassay for Rat Prolactin. Experimental Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-130-33657

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.