Cited by 20Estrogen and related hormone effectsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsCancer Risks and Factors

Stimulation of Mammary Tumorigenesis and Suppression of Uterine Adenomyosis by Temporary Inhibition of Pituitary Prolactin Secretion during Youth in Mice

Nagasawa, H., Mori, T.·1982·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The effects of daily subcutaneous injections of 0.2 mg CB-154 (bromocriptine-mesilate), a potent suppressor of pituitary prolactin secretion, between 4 and 11 weeks of age on the occurrence of spontaneous mammary tumors and adenomyosis, a hyperplasia of endometrial tissue, were studied in the SHN strain of virgin mice. While there was little difference in mammary tumor incidence between experimental and control mice until 9 months of age, mammary tumor incidence in the experimental mice given CB-154 was significantly enhanced and surpassed that in the control after 10 months; 25 (53.2%), 31 (66.0%), and 36 (75.5%) of 47 experimental mice and 20 (27.5%), 23 (33.3%), and 34 (49.3%) of 69 control mice developed mammary tumors at 10, 11, and 12 months of age, respectively. In contrast, no adenomyosis appeared in 39 experimental mice at necropsy at 12 months of age, while 15 (46.9%) of 32 control mice developed it. Furthermore, five mice (15.6%) of the control had numerous subserosal nodules, an advanced state of adenomyosis. No significant correlation was observed in the control mice between the occurrence of mammary tumors and that of adenomyosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3181/00379727-171-41492

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibition of pituitary prolactin secretion during youth in mice suppressed induction of adenomyosis, suggesting a potential role of prolactin.

    “but inhibition of pituitary prolactin secretion during youth in mice suppressed the induction of adenomyosis [60], suggesting the potential role of prolactin in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis.”

    From The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis (2020) · cites this paper as [60]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagasawa, H., & Mori, T.
Affiliations
  • Meiji University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
1982-11-01
Volume
171
Issue
2
Pages
164-167
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W2103617431
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
mammary carcinogenesis, adenomyosis, prolactin secretion, bromocriptine, CB-154, pituitary gland, endometrial hyperplasia, spontaneous mammary tumors, SHN mice
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Bromocriptine, Endometriosis, Female, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Mice, Inbred Strains, Prolactin, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review