The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estrogen and Progestin Bioactivity of Foods, Herbs, and Spices
Abstract
In this study we report on the content and bioactivity of plant (phyto) estrogens and progestins in various foods, herbs, and spices, before and after human consumption. Over 150 herbs traditionally used by herbalists for treating a variety of health problems were extracted and tested for their relative capacity to compete with estradiol and progesterone binding to intracellular receptors for progesterone (PR) and estradiol (ER) in intact human breast cancer cells. The six highest ER-binding herbs that are commonly consumed were soy, licorice, red clover, thyme, tumeric, hops, and verbena. The six highest PR-binding herbs and spices commonly consumed were oregano, verbena, tumeric, thyme, red clover and damiana. Some of the herbs and spices found to contain high phytoestrogens and phytoprogestins were further tested for bioactivity based on their ability to regulate cell growth rate in ER (+) and ER (-) breast cancer cell lines and to induce or inhibit the synthesis of alkaline phosphatase, an end product of progesterone action, in PR (+) cells. In general, we found that ER-binding herbal extracts were agonists, much like estradiol, whereas PR-binding extracts, were neutral or antagonists. The bioavailability of phytoestrogens and phytoprogestins in vivo were studied by quantitating the ER-binding and PR-binding capacity of saliva following consumption of soy milk, exogenous progesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate, or wild mexican yam products containing diosgenin. Soy milk caused a dramatic increase in saliva ER-binding components without a concomitant rise in estradiol. Consumption of PR-binding herbs increased the progestin activity of saliva, but there were marked differences in bioactivity. In summary, we have demonstrated that many of the commonly consumed foods, herbs, and spices contain phytoestrogens and phytoprogestins that act as agonists and antagonists in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kronenberg, F., & Fugh-Berman, A. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-10-200211190-00009 · Cited by 554
Liu, J., Burdette, J. E., Xu, H., Gu, C., van Breemen, R. B., Bhat, K. P. L., Booth, N., Constantinou, A. I., Pezzuto, J. M., Fong, H. H. S., et al. (2001) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0014157 · Cited by 428
Wang, Z. Y., & Nixon, D. W. (2001) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1207/s15327914nc391_1 · Cited by 288
Zhao, G., Kan, J., Li, Z., & Chen, Z. (2005) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.020 · Cited by 262
Preuss, H. G., Echard, B., Enig, M., Brook, I., & Elliott, T. B. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/s11010-005-6604-1 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Zava, D. T., Dollbaum, C. M., & Blen, M.
- Venue
- Experimental Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-378
- ISSN
- 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3702
- 1535-3699
- OpenAlex
- W1997736621
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogen and Progestin Bioactivity of Foods, Herbs, and Spices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3181/00379727-217-44247
- The paper
- Zava, D. T., Dollbaum, C. M., & Blen, M. (1998). Estrogen and Progestin Bioactivity of Foods, Herbs, and Spices. Experimental Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-217-44247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.