Implications of the mechanisms of action of tea polyphenols as antioxidants in vitro for chemoprevention in humans
Abstract
Considerable evidence points to the health benefits of the phytochemical constituents of fruit, vegetables, beverages, and grains in protection against cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. This may be accounted for through contributions from their constituent antioxidants (vitamin E, vitamin C, β-carotene, other carotenoids and the non-nutrient flavonoids, ubiquitous phytochemical components of the diet), as well as through other anticarcinogenic and cardioprotective effects independently of their antioxidant effects. Indeed, the epidemiological evidence for a risk-reducing role of vitamin C for cancer is not as strong as that for fruit and vegetables (1). Dietary components may contribute to antioxidant function in several ways that relate to their structural chemistry (2): i) by directly scavenging free radicals through hydrogen/electron donation, depending on their reducing properties, or reduction potentials; ii) by intercepting the propagatory chain reactions of lipid peroxidation and scavenging peroxyl radicals, also dependent on their reducing properties. Their effectiveness as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation will also relate to their accessibility to the site of action, defined by their partition coefficients; iii) by scavenging reactive nitrogen species and competitively inhibiting tyrosine nitration and DNA deamination; and iv) as preventative antioxidants by chelating transition metal ions and inhibiting the formation of iron-induced free radicals, and the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tea polyphenols are more potent as antioxidants than vitamins C and E.
“As AOs, tea polyphenols are more potent than vitamins C and E (132).”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [132]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 87
- Authors
- Rice-Evans, C.
- Corresponding author
- Rice-Evans, C.
- Venue
- Experimental Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 262-266
- ISSN
- 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3702
- 1535-3699
- OpenAlex
- W4240673491
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
- Keywords
- tea polyphenols, catechins, antioxidant defense, chemoprevention, reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, lipid peroxidation inhibition, free radical scavenging, metal chelation, tyrosine nitration, DNA deamination, cancer prevention, cardiovascular disease prevention, dietary phytochemicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review