Cited by 15Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage and Object Detection Techniques

A crater detection and identification algorithm for autonomous lunar landing

Clerc, Sébastien, Spigai, Marc, Simard-Bilodeau, Vincent·2010·IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3182/20100906-3-it-2019.00091

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [3]'s crater identification method was successful if the position information provided was very close to the true position, but resulted in a large number of mismatches otherwise.

    “This approach was successful if the position information provided was very close to the true position, but resulted in a large number of mismatches otherwise.”
  • Previous crater detectors based on traditional image processing methodologies like thresholding, edge detection, and filtering are highly sensitive to lighting conditions, noise, camera parameters, and viewing angles, and require precise modeling and specific tuning for different sets of images.

    “Previous works on lunar TRN systems have developed crater detectors that are based upon traditional image processing methodologies like thresholding, edge detection, and filtering [3].These crater detectors are highly sensitive to lighting conditions, noise, camera parameters, and viewing angles, and require precise modeling and specific tuning for different sets of images.”
  • The system of [3] used a crater detector based on traditional image processing methods, referred to as the trinary edge detector due to its method of finding craters through trinary thresholding and edge detection.

    “This lunar terrain relative navigation system used a crater detector based on traditional image processing methods, which we refer to as the trinary edge detector due to its method of finding craters through trinary thresholding and edge detection.”
  • [3] demonstrated the potential for craters to improve the state estimation of a spacecraft in lunar orbit, but struggled to consistently detect the same craters from frame to frame in a trajectory and experienced significant sensitivity to image quality, brightness, and shadowing.

    “This work demonstrated the potential for craters to improve the state estimation of a spacecraft in lunar orbit.However, it struggled to consistently detect the same craters from frame to frame in a trajectory and experienced significant sensitivity to image quality, brightness, and shadowing.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clerc, S., Spigai, M., & Simard-Bilodeau, V.
Affiliations
Thales Alenia Space (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Clerc, Sébastien
  • Spigai, Marc
Venue
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
43
Issue
16
Pages
527-532
ISSN
1474-6670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967382022
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IFAC Proceedings Volumes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
Keywords
crater detection, crater identification, camera pose estimation, visual feature detection, image segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review