Cited by 9Interactive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface DesignTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Safest Way to Scroll a List: A Usability Study Comparing Different Ways of Scrolling Through Lists on Touch Screen Devices

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3182/20130811-5-us-2037.00064

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Breuninger, J., Popova-Dlugosch, S., & Bengler, K.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Breuninger, Jurek
  • Popova-Dlugosch, Severina
  • Bengler, Klaus
Venue
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013
Volume
46
Issue
15
Pages
44-51
ISSN
1474-6670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037131838
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IFAC Proceedings Volumes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
touchscreen devices, tablet computers, scroll bars, direct manipulation, input speed, usability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Safest Way to Scroll a List: A Usability Study Comparing Different Ways of Scrolling Through Lists on Touch Screen Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3182/20130811-5-us-2037.00064
The paper
Breuninger, J., Popova-Dlugosch, S., & Bengler, K. (2013). The Safest Way to Scroll a List: A Usability Study Comparing Different Ways of Scrolling Through Lists on Touch Screen Devices. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130811-5-us-2037.00064