Cited by 268Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-traumatic stress disorder vs traumatic brain injury

Open access
Bryant, Richard·2011·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) often coexist because brain injuries are often sustained in traumatic experiences. This review outlines the significant overlap between PTSD and TBI by commencing with a critical outline of the overlapping symptoms and problems of differential diagnosis. The impact of TBI on PTSD is then described, with increasing evidence suggesting that mild TBI can increase risk for PTSD. Several explanations are offered for this enhanced risk. Recent evidence suggests that impairment secondary to mild TBI is largely attributable to stress reactions after TBI, which challenges the long-held belief that postconcussive symptoms are a function of neurological insult This recent evidence is pointing to new directions for treatment of postconcussive symptoms that acknowledge that treating stress factors following TBI may be the optimal means to manage the effects of many TBIs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2011.13.2/rbryant

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 106 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. American Psychiatric Association., 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
  2. Bryant RA., Depress Anxiety. In press
  3. Grigsby J., 1986, IntJ Clin Neuropsychol., 8, 65
  4. Friedman MJ., Depress Anxiety. In press
  5. World Health Organization., 1995, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. 1995 éd. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
  6. No authors listed., 1991, JAMA., 282, 974
  7. Price KP., 1994, Law J., 43, 113
  8. Castro CA., 2008, J Trauma-lnj Infect Crit Care., 64, S205
  9. Bryant RA., 1996, Trauma Stress., 9, 621, 10.1002/jts.2490090318 · DOI
  10. Koch WJ., 1995, Cogn BehavPract., 2, 327
  11. Orr SP., 1998, J Consult Clin Psychol., 66, 906, 10.1037/0022-006X.66.6.906 · DOI
  12. Bryant RA., 1996, Trauma Stress., 9, 621, 10.1002/jts.2490090318 · DOI
  13. King DW., 1999, J Abn Psychol., 108, 164, 10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.164 · DOI
  14. Gouvier WD., 1988, Arch Clin Neuropsychol., 3, 273, 10.1093/arclin/3.3.273 · DOI
  15. Machulda MM., 1998, Arch Clin Neuropsychol., 13, 415, 10.1093/arclin/13.5.415 · DOI
  16. Trahan DE., 2001, Arch Clin Neuropsychol., 16, 435, 10.1093/arclin/16.5.435 · DOI
  17. Iverson GL., 2003, Appl Neuropsychol., 10, 137, 10.1207/S15324826AN1003_02 · DOI
  18. Levin HS., 1987, Neurobehavioral Recovery from Head Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press., 262
  19. Rutherford WH., 1989, Neurobehavioral Recovery from Head Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 217
  20. Clark DM., 1996, American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry. Vol 16. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press
  21. Bryant RA., 1995, J Abnorm Psychol., 104, 537, 10.1037/0021-843X.104.3.537 · DOI
  22. McNally RJ., 1990, J Abnorm Psychol., 99, 398, 10.1037/0021-843X.99.4.398 · DOI
  23. Bryant RA., 1997, J Trauma Stress., 10, 635
  24. Foa EB., 2009, Effective treatments for PTSD: Practice guidelines from the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 268

Metadata

Authors
Bryant, R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Richard
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2011-09-30
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
251-262
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W4296930895
Cited by
268
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, mild traumatic brain injury, post-concussion symptoms, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review