The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments.
Open accessAbstract
This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition ("cognition about cognition"). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some "metacognitive knowledge" (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy. .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Deficits in metacognitive knowledge and awareness moreover are believed to lead to cognitive distortions (e.g., jumping to conclusions, attributional biases, theory of mind deficits) (60), dysfunctional beliefs and expectancies (associated with a low self-esteem and negative symptoms) (10, 95) and a lack of cognitive insight into those cognitive biases (96).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Compared to Metacognitive Therapy by Wells and Matthews, MCT not only focuses on general thinking mechanisms from a metacognitive perspective, but also on specific thoughts from a cognitive one by directly addressing thought contents (60).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The concept of MCT by Moritz and Woodward was originally inspired by research on cognitive biases in psychosis (65) and aims to convey metacognitive knowledge and raise metacognitive awareness for dysfunctional thought patterns (60, 122).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although MCT was originally developed for psychosis, it has been adapted for use in treating other disorders such as depression and personality disorders and can be applied in a transdiagnostic manner (60).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H.-N. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203 · Cited by 1,091
Wykes, T., Steel, C., Everitt, B., & Tarrier, N. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm114 · Cited by 1,029
Galletly, C., Castle, D., Dark, F., Humberstone, V., Jablensky, A., Killackey, E., Kulkarni, J., McGorry, P., Nielssen, O., & Tran, N. (2016) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867416641195 · Cited by 877
Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence.
Garety, P. A., & Freeman, D. (1999) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466599162700 · Cited by 794
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667
Tulving, E., & Madigan, S. A. (1970) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.21.020170.002253 · Cited by 393
Persecutory delusions: a cognitive perspective on understanding and treatment.
Freeman, D. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00066-3 · Cited by 356
Psychological interventions for psychosis: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies
Turner, D. T., van der Gaag, M., Karyotaki, E., & Cuijpers, P. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081159 · Cited by 350
The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable
Garety, P. A., & Freeman, D. H. (2013) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126953 · Cited by 345
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- FowlerDGaretyPKuipersE1995 Chichester, UK Wiley
- FisherPWellsA2009 Sussex, UK Routledge
- KoriatAPerfectTJSchwartzBLMetacognition research: An interim report2002 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 261286
- ChadwickPBirchwoodMTrowerP1996 Chichester, UK Wiley
- MorrisonARentonJDunnHWilliamsSBentallR2004 New York, NY Routledge
- MorrisEJohnsLOliverJ2013 London, UK Wiley
- ChadwickP2006 London Wiley
- GaebelWAlkomietHFalkaiP2019 Berlin, Germany Springer
- Laws KR, 2016, Front Psychol, 7, 59
- WellsA2009 New York Guilford Press
- WellsAFisherPLWellsAFisherPLMetacognitive therapy: theoretical background and model of depression. 2016 Chichester (UK) John Wiley & Sons 144168
- Schneider BC, 2018, Z Psychol, 226, 164
- Bleuler E, 1950, .
- Lysaker PH, 2017, .
- Lysaker PH, 2019, J Exp Psychopathol
- Lysaker PH, 2019, Schizophr Res Cogn
- de Jong S, 2018, Psychol Psychother
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, Y., Tang, C., Hung, T., Tsai, P., & Lin, M. (2018) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12282 · Cited by 109
Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy: A Recovery-Oriented Treatment Approach for Psychosis
Lysaker, P. H., Gagen, E. C., Klion, R. E., Zalzala, A. B., Vohs, J. L., Faith, L. A., Leonhardt, B. L., Hamm, J. A., & Hasson‐Ohayon, I. (2020) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s198628 · Cited by 104
Lysaker, P. H., Cheli, S., Dimaggio, G., Buck, B., Bonfils, K. A., Huling, K. S., Wiesepape, C. N., & Lysaker, J. T. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03338-4 · Cited by 97
Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): past, present, and future
Moritz, S., Menon, M., Balzan, R. P., & Woodward, T. S. (2022) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01394-9 · Cited by 67
Psychosis spectrum illnesses as disorders of prefrontal critical period plasticity
Vinogradov, S., Chafee, M. V., Lee, E. G., & Morishita, H. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01451-w · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Moritz, S., Klein, J. P., Lysaker, P. H., & Mehl, S.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Moritz, Steffen
- Venue
- Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-09-30
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-317
- ISSN
- 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
- 1958-5969
- PMC
- PMC6829173
- OpenAlex
- W2990591564
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
- Servier
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- psychosis, schizophrenia, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, metacognition, metacognitive beliefs, thought suppression, cognitive biases, overconfidence, identity, psychotherapy efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Metacognition, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
