Cited by 187Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMemory Processes and Influences

Metacognition – What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions.

Moritz, Steffen, Lysaker, Paul H.·2018·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

In the last two decades years, several interventions have been designed for people with major psychological disorders that all have "metacognitive" in their name: Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), Metacognitive Training (e.g., for people with psychosis) and Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT). Two of these interventions are primarily targeted at patients with schizophrenia. Prompted by a recent discussion about what constitutes "true" metacognitive treatment, we will first explore the original concept of metacognition as defined by James H. Flavell. Then, we will describe each approach in detail before highlighting how each intervention picks up on slightly different aspects of Flavell's original metacognitive construct. We will also discuss inherent problems with the label "metacognition."

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing treatments only cover certain aspects of the larger construct of metacognition, and authors call for intervention development that incorporates all four metacognitive domains into hybrid approaches.

    “However, authors criticize that existing treatments only cover certain aspects of the larger construct of metacognition (see Supplementary Table 3) (93) and call for intervention development that incorporate all four metacognitive domains into hybrid approaches (104).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moritz, S., & Lysaker, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Moritz, Steffen
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
201
Pages
20-26
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808041219
Cited by
187
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognition
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Psychological Theory, Schizophrenia, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review