The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Covert contraceptive use: Prevalence, motivations, and consequences
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines women’s covert use of contraceptives, that is, use without the knowledge of their husbands. Covert use may highlight conflict between husbands and wives about family planning, or it may reflect behaviors that spouses find difficult to discuss together. This study addresses three questions: 1) How is covert use measured in different settings? 2) How prevalent is it? and 3) What are the factors underlying covert use? We examine these questions by drawing on existing studies and detailed survey and qualitative data collected in 1997 in an urban setting in Zambia from married women and a subsample of their husbands. The prevalence of women’s covert use of contraceptives is estimated to account for between 6 and 20 percent of all current contraceptive use and is more widespread in settings where contraceptive prevalence is low. A multivariate analysis of women’s covert use based on the Zambia survey data indicates that difficult spousal communication about contraception is the strongest determinant of covert use. The positive effect of husbands’ disapproval of contraception on covert use works through spousal communication rather than as a direct influence. Husbands’ pronatalism had no significant effect on covert use. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of covert use for policies and programs addressing reproductive health issues and gender relations, especially the extent and nature of partner involvement that should be encouraged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blanc, A. K. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00189.x · Cited by 610
On the quantum and tempo of fertility
Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998) · doi:10.31899/pgy6.1010 · Cited by 580
Shattuck, D., Kerner, B., Gilles, K., Hartmann, M., Ng'ombe, T., & Guest, G. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.300091 · Cited by 335
The decline of female circumcision in Egypt: evidence and interpretation
El-Gibaly, O., Ibrahim, B., Mensch, B. S., & Clark, W. H. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00020-x · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Biddlecom, A., & Fapohunda, B.
- Publisher
- Population Council
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 360-72
- OpenAlex
- W2032250448
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covert contraceptive use: Prevalence, motivations, and consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31899/pgy6.1009
- The paper
- Biddlecom, A., & Fapohunda, B. (1998). Covert contraceptive use: Prevalence, motivations, and consequences. https://doi.org/10.31899/pgy6.1009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.