Cited by 21Probiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections researchGut microbiota and health

Sauerkraut: A Probiotic Superfood

Open access
Orgeron II, Ryan Paul, Corbin, Angela, Scott, Brigett·2016·Functional Foods in Health and Disease

Abstract

Background: Sauerkraut could potentially be a probiotic superfood. Sauerkraut does not require the use of a starter culture to cultivate these beneficial bacteria. All that is needed is a measure of salt and the cabbage. Naturally made, unprocessed sauerkraut contains probiotic microorganisms called Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB). LAB is one of the most significant organisms and has established benefits. For example, Lactic Acid Bacteria has established benefits with the treatment of diarrhea, constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, infections (urogenital, urinary and candida). LAB have also been shown to enhance immune system function to help prevent various illnesses and promote lactose digestion. Nevertheless, there is very little conclusive evidence on how much LAB is in sauerkraut and if there is enough present to confer benefits. Purpose: Determine if various serving sizes of homemade sauerkraut (2 Tbsp., 1⁄2 cup, & 1 cup) meets the recommended CFU range in comparison to a control (supplement probiotic). Methods: Sauerkraut was prepared with no starter culture. Modified Lactobacillus Media was used to culture LAB. The capsule serving (0.8g) was diluted with 99.2g PBS (1/100) and 10g of sauerkraut was diluted with 90g PBS (1/10). For serial dilutions, 1mL of each of the samples was diluted into 9 mL MRS broth for the dilutions (10-1-10-10). Then 1mL from each test tube is transferred into corresponding petri dishes. Melted Lactobacillus MRS agar is then mixed into each of the petri dishes. All petri dishes are then placed into a candle light jar and placed in an incubator at 37 degrees Celsius (98.6oF) for 5 days. After five days, the petri dishes with 25-250 visible cultures were counted. The number counted was multiplied by the dilution which gave the total number CFUs/g. The LAB concentration of the sauerkraut was calculated by multiplying the CFU/g times the serving size. Results: The results were calculated as the mean of CFUs recorded from the 3 trials for both the control (supplement) and the sauerkraut. The control group was calculated as a mean of 4.3x107 CFUs with a Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of 3.5% CFUs. The sauerkraut averages were calculated for each of the serving sizes. The 2 Tbsp. serving has a mean of 1.5x106 (RSD= 32%), the 1⁄2 cup has a mean of 5.9x106 (RSD= 31%), and the 1 cup serving has a mean of 1.2x107 (RSD= 30%). Conclusion: The study concludes that sauerkraut (even the two Tbsp. serving) meets the recommended CFU range. Based on these findings, sauerkraut can be considered a “probiotic superfood”. Keywords: Sauerkraut, probiotic superfood, supplement probiotic, Lactobacillus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31989/ffhd.v6i8.262

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sauerkraut health benefits include increasing bioavailability of nutrients, promoting gut health, cardioprotective action, stimulating the immune system, antihyperlipidemic activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and anticancer properties.

    “The health benefits include increasing the bioavailability of nutrients, promoting gut health, cardioprotective action, stimulating the immune system, antihyperlipidemic activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and anticancer properties [199].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Campbell-McBride N. Gut And Psychology Syndrome. [Cambridge, U.K.: Medinform Pub.]; 2010.
  2. Pederson, C. S., and M. N. Albury. 1969. The sauerkraut fermentation. Technical bulletin 824. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orgeron II, R. P., Corbin, A., & Scott, B.
Affiliations
Nicholls State University (US)
Venue
Functional Foods in Health and Disease
Published
2016-08-30
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
536
ISSN
  • 2160-3855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2378-7007
OpenAlex
W2512488697
Cited by
21
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Functional Foods in Health and Disease (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, serving size, fermented cabbage, Lactobacillus, probiotic supplements, CFU counts, gut microbiota, fermented foods, immune function, lactose digestion, irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhea, constipation, candidiasis, urinary tract infection, urogenital infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review