Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inexperienced Versus Experienced Students' Expectations For Active Learning in Large Classes

Messineo, Melinda, Gaither, George, Bott, Jennifer, Ritchey, Kristin·2007·College Teaching

Abstract

Findings from a survey of undergraduates demonstrate links between students' experience level and their perceptions and expectations of large classes. The authors made a number of hypotheses, including that students prefer active-learning experiences but expect passive-learning experiences, that experienced students prefer large classes but demonstrate less commitment to them, and that students view low-level skills as more important than high-level skills in large classes. Findings supported the hypotheses, and implications of these findings as they relate to pedagogy in large classes are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/ctch.55.3.125-133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Appleby, D. 2003. Three degrees of separation from original knowledge that challenge psychology students as they enter and progress through undergraduate programs. Eye on Psi Chi 7 (Spring): 34-37. · DOI
  2. Bickman, M. 2003. Minding American education: Reclaiming the tradition of active learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
  3. Carbone, E., and J. Greenberg. 1998. Teaching large classes: Unpacking the problem and responding creatively. In To improve the academy, vol. 17, ed. M. Kaplan, 311-26. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. · DOI
  4. Chatman, S. 1997. Lower-division class size at U.S. postsecondary institutions. Research in Higher Education 38 (5): 615-30. · DOI
  5. Cooper, J. L., and P. Robinson. 2000. The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 81 (Spring): 5-16. · DOI
  6. Dunham, R. E., and M. Gleason. 1984. Challenges of the introductory course. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 20 (December): 39-52. · DOI
  7. Edmondson, J., and F. Mulder. 1924. Size of class as a factor in university instruction. Journal of Educational Research 9 (1): 1-12. · DOI
  8. Feigenbaum, E., and R. Friend. 1992. A comparison of freshmen and upper-division students' preferences for small and large psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology 19 (1): 12-15. · DOI
  9. Glass, G. V., and M. L. Smith. 1979. Metaanalysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1 (1): 2-16. · DOI
  10. Hedges, L. V., and W. Stock. 1983. The effects of class size: An examination of rival hypotheses. American Educational Research Journal 20 (1): 63-85. · DOI
  11. Kulik, J. A., and C. L. C. Kulik. 1989. Meta-analysis in education. International Journal of Educational Research 13 (3): 220-340. · DOI
  12. Light, R. J. 2001. Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. · DOI
  13. Merrow, J. 2005. Afterword. In Declining by degrees higher education at risk, ed. R. H. Hersh and J. Merrow, 233-36. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Nye, B., L. V. Hedges, and S. Konstantopoulos. 2002. Do low-achieving students benefit more from small classes? Evidence from the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (3): 201-17. · DOI
  15. Strauss, L. C., and J. F. Volkwein. 2004. Predictors of student commitment at two-year and four-year institutions. Journal of Higher Education 75 (2): 203-27. · DOI
  16. Toth, L. S., and L. G. Montagna. 2002. Class size and achievement in higher education: A summary of current research. College Student Journal 36 (2): 253-60.
  17. Vallerand, R. J., L. G. Pelletier, M. R. Blais, N. M. Briere, C. Senecal, and E. F. Vallieres. 1992. The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement 52 (4): 1003-17. · DOI
  18. Vallerand, R. J., L. G. Pelletier, M. R. Blais, N. M. Briere, C. Senecal, and E. F. Vallieres. 1993. On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence of the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (1): 159-72. · DOI
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Wulff, D. H., J. D. Nyquist, and R. D. Abbott. 1987. Students' perceptions of large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 32 (Winter): 17-30. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Messineo, M., Gaither, G., Bott, J., & Ritchey, K.
Venue
College Teaching
Published
2007-07
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
125-133
ISSN
  • 8756-7555
  • 1930-8299
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review