CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Child Development and Digital TechnologyMedia Influence and HealthParental Involvement in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring Pathways From Television Viewing to Academic Achievement in School Age Children

Shin, Nary·2004·The Journal of Genetic Psychology
DOI 10.3200/gntp.165.4.367-382
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The author's purpose in this study was to test 4 hypotheses that proposed different paths for the influences of children's television viewing on their academic achievement. Data were drawn from the 1997 Child Development Supplement (CDS) to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The population for this study included 1,203 children between the ages of 6 and 13 years from the CDS-PSID data set. The author used structural equation modeling to test pathways from children's television viewing to their academic achievement. The author assumed that children's television viewing hindered their academic achievement by reducing certain traits that related to academic achievement. Results showed that 3 hypothetical models fit the data--the time-displacement hypothesis, the mental effort-passivity hypothesis, and the attention-arousal hypothesis. A 4th hypothetical model, the learning-information hypothesis, which proposed that children's television viewing practices stimulate their academic achievement, was not supported. In sum, children who watched more television tended to spend less time doing homework, studying, and reading for leisure. In addition, their behaviors became more impulsive, which resulted in an eventual decrease in their academic achievement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/gntp.165.4.367-382

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Collins, W. A. (1982). Cognitive processing in television viewing. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2; pp. 9-23). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  2. Singer, D. G., & Singer J. L. (2001). The popular media as educators and socializers of growing children. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 1-6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  3. Singer, J. L. (1980). The power and limits of television: A cognitive-affective analysis. In P. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment function of television (pp. 31-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. G. (1983). Psychologists look at television. American Psychologist, 38(7), 826-834. · DOI
  5. Suedfeld, P., Little, B. R., Rank, A. D., Rank, D. S., & Ballard, E. J. (1986). Television and adults: Thinking, personality, and attitudes. In T. M. Williams (Ed.), The impact of television: A natural experiment in three communities (pp. 361-394). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–112 of 112

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shin, N.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shin, Nary
ORCID
Shin, Nary
Venue
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2004-12
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
367-382
ISSN
  • 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0896
DOI
10.3200/gntp.165.4.367-382
OpenAlex
W2002874583
Cited by
112
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
32.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
children's television viewing, academic performance, elementary school students, time displacement, cognitive effort, passivity, homework time, reading for pleasure, impulsivity, media effects on learning
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Leisure Activities, Male, Prospective Studies, Reading, Schools, Students, Television, Time Factors, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review