Cited by 1,015Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions.

Salomon, Gavriel·1984·Journal of Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salomon, G.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Salomon, Gavriel
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1984-08
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
647-658
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2074791822
Cited by
1,015
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
television learning, perceived effort, cognitive effort, learning effort, attribution, media effects on learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review