Cited by 16Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyMental Health Treatment and Access

Assessing the risk factors for suicidal thoughts at a nontraditional commuter school

Gillman, Jason L., Kim, Han S., Alder, Stephen Craig, Durrant, Lynne H.·2006·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

The sample of students completing the National College Health Assessment (NCHA) Survey at the University of Utah differs from the national reference group for the NCHA 2003 in age, employment, residence, and marital status. The purpose of this study is to determine if the defining characteristics of a commuter school increase the risk for suicidal thoughts. During the fall semester of 2004, the University of Utah implemented a randomized electronic survey assessing the student body's health status in several areas. The authors compared 88 respondents who endorsed seriously considered suicide in the previous 12 months were with the remaining 954 respondents to identify discriminating variables. Those students who seriously considered suicide more likely lived off campus, indicated they were emotionally abused, were in only fair health, experienced being assaulted, experienced unwanted sexual touching, or were not heterosexual. Students who were employed were significantly less likely to consider suicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/jach.55.1.17-26

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has shown an increased incidence of mental health challenges in students who live off-campus.

    “These results concur with previous research that has shown an increased incidence of mental health challenges in those students who live off-campus (Eisenberg et al., 2007; Gillman et al., 2006; Lester, 2013; Omokhodion and Gureje, 2003; Othieno et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillman, J. L., Kim, H. S., Alder, S. C., & Durrant, L. H.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2006-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W2048640404
Cited by
16
References
14
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal ideation, risk factors, commuter students, non-traditional students, university students, emotional abuse, assault, student employment, sexual orientation, student health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Schools, Students, Suicide, Transportation, Utah, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review