Illicit Use of Prescription ADHD Medications on a College Campus: A Multimethodological Approach
Abstract
Objective The authors used quantitative and qualitative methodologies to investigate college students' perceptions and use of illegal Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) stimulants during spring and summer 2006. Participants From fall 2005 through fall 2006, the authors studied 1,811 undergraduates at a large, public, southeastern research university in the United States. Methods The authors administered surveys to these students and conducted 175 in-depth interviews. Results Of the study participants, 34% reported the illegal use of ADHD stimulants. Most illegal users reported using ADHD stimulants primarily in periods of high academic stress and found them to reduce fatigue while increasing reading comprehension, interest, cognition, and memory. Furthermore, most had little information about the drug and found procurement to be both easy and stigmafree. Conclusions This study supplies a rich understanding of the growing national trend of illegal ADHD stimulant use. The authors discuss strategies for stemming the tide of ADHD stimulant use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a firmly held belief that stimulant medication improves executive functions and academic skills while decreasing distractibility, restlessness, fatigue, and sleepiness.
“There is a firmly held belief that stimulant medication improves executive functions (EFs; e.g., sustained attention, working memory) and academic skills (e.g., reading comprehension, productivity) while decreasing distractibility, restlessness, fatigue, and sleepiness (Benson et al., 2015; DeSantis et al., 2008; Hartung et al., 2013; Rabiner et al., 2009).”
From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as DeSantis et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 392
- Authors
- DeSantis, A. D., Webb, E. M., & Noar, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- ORCID
- Noar, Seth M.
- Venue
- Journal of American College Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-324
- ISSN
- 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
- 0744-8481
- 1940-3208
- OpenAlex
- W2070973619
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- ADHD stimulants, illicit drug use, university students, prescription drug misuse, academic stress, stigma, student perceptions, fatigue, cognitive enhancement
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Amphetamines, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Data Collection, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Methylphenidate, Pilot Projects, United States, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review