Cited by 130Accounting Education and CareersAccounting and Financial ManagementHigher Education and Employability

An Empirical Investigation of the Relevant Skills of Forensic Accountants

Digabriele, James A.·2008·Journal of Education for Business

Abstract

The author investigated whether views of the relevant skills of forensic accountants differ among forensic accounting practitioners, accounting academics, and users of forensic accounting services. Universities and colleges are currently considering adding forensic accounting courses to their curriculum. The results of the present study provide much-needed guidance to educators for the development of forensic accounting curriculum by identifying pertinent skills to accompany a program of study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/joeb.83.6.331-338

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Digabriele, J. A.
Affiliations
Montclair State University (US)
Corresponding author
Digabriele, James A.
Venue
Journal of Education for Business
Published
2008-07
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
331-338
ISSN
  • 0883-2323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-3356
OpenAlex
W1990537646
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Education for Business (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Education and Careers
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
forensic accounting, forensic accounting education, practitioner perspectives, academic perspectives, user perspective, accounting education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review