The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cyber-Ethics: Pirates in the Classroom
Abstract
"Cyber-Ethics: Pirates in the Classroom." Science Activities, 41(3), pp. 3–4
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To help motivate ICT compliance, students need more education around cybersecurity risks (Snyder, 2004), the content of ICT policies, the importance of intellectual property rights (Kruger, 2003), and the ethical foundations of ICT and cybersecurity policies (Formosa et al., 2021).”
From The influence of ethical principles and policy awareness priming on university students’ judgements about ICT code of conduct compliance (2022) · cites this paper as Snyder, 2004
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Richards, D., Nazeer Khan, S. B., Formosa, P., & Bankins, S. (2022) · Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People · doi:10.1108/ocj-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, M. G.
- Corresponding author
- Snyder, Melanie G
- Venue
- Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3-4
- ISSN
- 0036-8121 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1302
- OpenAlex
- W2001516899
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science Activities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- cyber ethics, pirates, classroom activities, digital ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
