The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS
Open accessAbstract
The virologic test results of 415 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were examined. The peak detection rate for SARS-associated coronavirus occurred at week 2 after illness onset for respiratory specimens, at weeks 2 to 3 for stool or rectal swab specimens, and at week 4 for urine specimens. The latest stool sample that was positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was collected on day 75 while the patient was receiving intensive care. Tracheal aspirate and stool samples had a higher diagnostic yield (RT-PCR average positive rate for first 2 weeks: 66.7% and 56.5%, respectively). Pooled throat and nasal swabs, rectal swab, nasal swab, throat swab, and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens provided a moderate yield (29.7%-40.0%), whereas throat washing and urine specimens showed a lower yield (17.3% and 4.5%). The collection procedures for stool and pooled nasal and throat swab specimens were the least likely to transmit infection, and the combination gave the highest yield for coronavirus detection by RT-PCR. Positive virologic test results in patient groups were associated with mechanical ventilation or death (p < 0.001), suggesting a correlation between viral load and disease severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
Drosten, C., Günther, S., Preiser, W., van der Werf, S., Brodt, H.-R., Becker, S., Rabenau, H., Panning, M., Kolesnikova, L., Fouchier, R. A. M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030747 · Cited by 4,574
Cited by
Alhazzani, W., Møller, M. H., Arabi, Y. M., Loeb, M., Gong, M. N., Fan, E., Oczkowski, S., Levy, M. M., Derde, L., Dzierba, A., et al. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5 · Cited by 2,105
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection
Cheng, V. C. C., Lau, S. K. P., Woo, P. C. Y., & Yuen, K. Y. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00023-07 · Cited by 1,192
Yang, Y., Yang, M., Shen, C., Wang, F., Yuan, J., Li, J., Zhang, M., Wang, Z., Xing, L., Wei, J., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, P. K. S., To, W.-K., Ng, K.-C., Lam, R. K. Y., Ng, T.-K., Chan, R. C. W., Wu, A., Yu, W.-C., Lee, N., Hui, D. S. C., Lai, S.-T., Hon, E. K. L., Li, C.-K., Sung, J. J. Y., & Tam, J. S.
- Venue
- Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 825-831
- ISSN
- 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6059
- OpenAlex
- W2015102952
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid1005.030682
- The paper
- Chan, P. K. S., To, W.-K., Ng, K.-C., Lam, R. K. Y., Ng, T.-K., Chan, R. C. W., Wu, A., Yu, W.-C., Lee, N., Hui, D. S. C., Lai, S.-T., Hon, E. K. L., Li, C.-K., Sung, J. J. Y., & Tam, J. S. (2004). Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1005.030682
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.