Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS

Open access
Chan, Paul K. S., To, Wing-Kin, Ng, King-Cheung, Lam, Rebecca K. Y., Ng, Tak-Keung, Chan, Rickjason C. W., Wu, Alan, Yu, Wai-Cho, Lee, Nelson, Hui, David S. C., Lai, Sik-To, Hon, Ellis K. L., Li, Chi-Kong, Sung, Joseph J. Y., Tam, John S.·2004·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The virologic test results of 415 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were examined. The peak detection rate for SARS-associated coronavirus occurred at week 2 after illness onset for respiratory specimens, at weeks 2 to 3 for stool or rectal swab specimens, and at week 4 for urine specimens. The latest stool sample that was positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was collected on day 75 while the patient was receiving intensive care. Tracheal aspirate and stool samples had a higher diagnostic yield (RT-PCR average positive rate for first 2 weeks: 66.7% and 56.5%, respectively). Pooled throat and nasal swabs, rectal swab, nasal swab, throat swab, and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens provided a moderate yield (29.7%-40.0%), whereas throat washing and urine specimens showed a lower yield (17.3% and 4.5%). The collection procedures for stool and pooled nasal and throat swab specimens were the least likely to transmit infection, and the combination gave the highest yield for coronavirus detection by RT-PCR. Positive virologic test results in patient groups were associated with mechanical ventilation or death (p < 0.001), suggesting a correlation between viral load and disease severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1005.030682

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Chan, P. K. S., To, W.-K., Ng, K.-C., Lam, R. K. Y., Ng, T.-K., Chan, R. C. W., Wu, A., Yu, W.-C., Lee, N., Hui, D. S. C., Lai, S.-T., Hon, E. K. L., Li, C.-K., Sung, J. J. Y., & Tam, J. S.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
825-831
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2015102952
Cited by
158
References
1
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid1005.030682
The paper
Chan, P. K. S., To, W.-K., Ng, K.-C., Lam, R. K. Y., Ng, T.-K., Chan, R. C. W., Wu, A., Yu, W.-C., Lee, N., Hui, D. S. C., Lai, S.-T., Hon, E. K. L., Li, C.-K., Sung, J. J. Y., & Tam, J. S. (2004). Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1005.030682

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.