Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antimicrobial Resistance among Campylobacter Strains, United States, 1997–2001

Open access
Gupta, Amita, Nelson, Jennifer M., Barrett, Timothy J., Tauxe, Robert V., Rossiter, Shannon P., Friedman, Cindy R., Joyce, Kevin W., Smith, Kirk E., Jones, Timothy F., Hawkins, Marguerite A., Shiferaw, Beletshachew, Beebe, James L., Vugia, Duc J., Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry, Benson, James A., Root, Timothy P., Angulo, Frederick J., for the NARMS Working Group·2004·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

We summarize antimicrobial resistance surveillance data in human and chicken isolates of Campylobacter.Isolates were from a sentinel county study from 1989 through 1990 and from nine state health departments participating in National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System for enteric bacteria (NARMS) from 1997 through 2001.None of the 297 C. jejuni or C. coli isolates tested from 1989 through 1990 was ciprofloxacin-resistant. From 1997 through 2001, a total of 1,553 human Campylobacter isolates were characterized: 1,471 (95%) were C. jejuni, 63 (4%) were C. coli, and 19 (1%) were other Campylobacter species.The prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter was 13% (28 of 217) in 1997 and 19% (75 of 384) in 2001; erythromycin resistance was 2% (4 of 217) in 1997 and 2% (8 of 384) in 2001.Ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter was isolated from 10% of 180 chicken products purchased from grocery stores in three states in 1999.Ciprofloxacin resistance has emerged among Campylobacter since 1990 and has increased in prevalence since 1997.C ampylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in the United States, causing an estimated 2.4 million human infections annually (1).Diagnosed infections have declined in recent years.In 2001, FoodNet surveillance identified 13.4 diagnosed Campylobacter infections per 100,000 persons (2).Approximately 95% of diagnosed Campylobacter infections are due to C. jejuni (3).Although most Campylobacter infections cause an acute, self-limited illness characterized by diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps, severe infections do occur (4).Antimicrobial treatment can shorten the duration of illness and may be life-saving in invasive infections (5-7).Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) are often prescribed empirically for the treatment of gastroenteritis and for Campylobacter infections in adults (6,8).Quinolones (e.g., nalidixic acid), although now seldom used for treatment in the United States, are frequently used to screen for fluoroquinolone resistance because of the close correlation between quinolone and fluoroquinolone resistance among Campylobacter.Macrolides, such as erythromycin, are also prescribed to treat Campylobacter infections (4,9).Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections in humans were first detected in Europe in the late 1980s (10-12).Subsequently, an increasing proportion of Campylobacter isolates around the world have been found to be fluoroquinolone-resistant (13).Studies in the United States, Europe, and New Zealand have identified poultry as a principal source of Campylobacter infection (14-16).Quinolones have been available in human medicine since the mid-1960s, and the first fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) was approved for use in humans in 1986.Two fluoroquinolones, sarafloxacin and enrofloxacin, were approved for use in poultry by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995 and 1996, respectively (17).These fluoroquinolones were the first ones approved in food animals; subsequently, other fluoroquinolones have been approved for veterinary use but not for use in poultry (18).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1006.030635

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, A., Nelson, J. M., Barrett, T. J., Tauxe, R. V., Rossiter, S. P., Friedman, C. R., Joyce, K. W., Smith, K. E., Jones, T. F., Hawkins, M. A., Shiferaw, B., Beebe, J. L., Vugia, D. J., Rabatsky-Ehr, T., Benson, J. A., Root, T. P., Angulo, F. J., & for the NARMS Working Group
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1102-1109
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2045954937
Cited by
269
References
1
FWCI
31.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Resistance among Campylobacter Strains, United States, 1997–2001. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid1006.030635
The paper
Gupta, A., Nelson, J. M., Barrett, T. J., Tauxe, R. V., Rossiter, S. P., Friedman, C. R., Joyce, K. W., Smith, K. E., Jones, T. F., Hawkins, M. A., Shiferaw, B., Beebe, J. L., Vugia, D. J., Rabatsky-Ehr, T., Benson, J. A., Root, T. P., Angulo, F. J., & for the NARMS Working Group. (2004). Antimicrobial Resistance among Campylobacter Strains, United States, 1997–2001. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1006.030635

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.