The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MRSA Transmission between Cows and Humans
Open accessAbstract
We isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from cows with subclinical mastitis and from a person who worked with these animals.The bovine and human strains were indistinguishable by phenotyping and genotyping methods and were of a low frequency spa type.To our knowledge, this finding indicates the first documented case of direct transmission of MRSA between cows and humans.S ince the introduction of β-lactamase-stable antimicro- bial drugs into clinical use, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged worldwide as important nosocomial pathogens; their prevalence in the community is increasing substantially.Although S. aureus is known to be one of the most common causes of bovine mastitis and other severe animal diseases such as septicemia and wound, bone, and joint infections, MRSA strains have been rarely isolated from animals.MRSA strains have been isolated from cows with mastitis, horses and dogs with lesions, and dogs and cats that were carriers (1).Transmission of MRSA between humans and animals (e.g., dogs, horses, pigs) has been reported (2-4), but transmission between cows and humans has not, to our knowledge.We describe a first putative case of transmission of MRSA between cows and a person.From January 2002through December 2004, 595 milk samples were collected from cows with subclinical mastitis on a farm in Hungary and sent for bacteriologic analysis to the Bacteriological Department of the Hungarian Central Veterinary Institute.Samples were streaked onto a Columbia agar plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 5% sheep blood and 0.01% esculin and a Baird-Parker (BP) agar plate (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, England).After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the colonies were tentatively identified according to morphologic features, pigment production, Gram stain results, catalase test results, type of hemolysis, and characteristic growth on BP
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Weese, J. S., & van Duijkeren, E. (2010) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.039 · Cited by 629
Self-citationMolecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Kowalewski, C., Krolak-Ulinska, A., & Marusza, W. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23158088 · Cited by 412
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans
Graveland, H., Duim, B., van Duijkeren, E., Heederik, D., & Wagenaar, J. A. (2011) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.004 · Cited by 308
Self-citationLivestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat
Fitzgerald, J. R. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.006 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Juhász-Kaszanyitzky, É., Jánosi, S., Somogyi, P., Dán, Á., van Bloois, L. V., van Duijkeren, E., & Wagenaar, J. A.
- Venue
- Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 630-632
- ISSN
- 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6059
- OpenAlex
- W1994959028
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRSA Transmission between Cows and Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid1304.060833
- The paper
- Juhász-Kaszanyitzky, É., Jánosi, S., Somogyi, P., Dán, Á., van Bloois, L. V., van Duijkeren, E., & Wagenaar, J. A. (2007). MRSA Transmission between Cows and Humans. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1304.060833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.