Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 239 of the 242 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 155 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, Beata, Kowalewski, Cezary, Krolak-Ulinska, Aneta, Marusza, Wojciech·2022·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

This paper discusses the mechanisms of S. aureus drug resistance including: (1) introduction. (2) resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, with particular emphasis on the mec genes found in the Staphylococcaceae family, the structure and occurrence of SCCmec cassettes, as well as differences in the presence of some virulence genes and its expression in major epidemiological types and clones of HA-MRSA, CA-MRSA, and LA-MRSA strains. Other mechanisms of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics will also be discussed, such as mutations in the gdpP gene, BORSA or MODSA phenotypes, as well as resistance to ceftobiprole and ceftaroline. (3) Resistance to glycopeptides (VRSA, VISA, hVISA strains, vancomycin tolerance). (4) Resistance to oxazolidinones (mutational and enzymatic resistance to linezolid). (5) Resistance to MLS-B (macrolides, lincosamides, ketolides, and streptogramin B). (6) Aminoglycosides and spectinomicin, including resistance genes, their regulation and localization (plasmids, transposons, class I integrons, SCCmec), and types and spectrum of enzymes that inactivate aminoglycosides. (7). Fluoroquinolones (8) Tetracyclines, including the mechanisms of active protection of the drug target site and active efflux of the drug from the bacterial cell. (9) Mupirocin. (10) Fusidic acid. (11) Daptomycin. (12) Resistance to other antibiotics and chemioterapeutics (e.g., streptogramins A, quinupristin/dalfopristin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, fosfomycin, trimethoprim) (13) Molecular epidemiology of MRSA.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This review summarizes molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in *Staphylococcus aureus*, covering beta-lactams, glycopeptides, oxazolidinones, MLS-B, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, mupirocin, fusidic acid, daptomycin, and other agents. It emphasizes SCC*mec*/*mec*-mediated methicillin resistance, VanA-mediated glycopeptide resistance, and mobile genetic elements as drivers of multidrug resistance.

Key findings

  • Methicillin resistance is chiefly mediated by PBP2A encoded by *mec* genes within SCC*mec* cassettes; 14 major SCC*mec* types have been described, ranging from 21 to 82 thousand nucleotides, with *mecA*, *mecC*, and other *mec* variants distributed across staphylococci.
  • Beta-lactam resistance also involves beta-lactamases (*blaZ*) and rare PBP mutations; a *mecA*-negative CRB strain had ceftobiprole MIC = 128 mg/L, ceftriaxone MIC = 256 mg/L, cefazolin MIC > 256 mg/L, nafcillin MIC = 128 mg/L, ampicillin MIC = 256 mg/L, and cefoxitin MIC = 8 mg/L.
  • Glycopeptide resistance via the VanA operon in Tn*1546* confers vancomycin MIC 64–1024 mg/L and teicoplanin MIC 16–512 mg/L; only about a dozen VRSA strains with VanA have been described. In 187 MRSA strains from 41 Spanish hospitals, vancomycin tolerance was 9.6% and teicoplanin tolerance 21.9%.
  • Aminoglycoside resistance commonly involves AAC(6′)-Ie/APH(2″)-Ia, the only enzyme known in *S. aureus* to determine gentamicin resistance; gentamicin MICs ranged from 8 mg/L to >1024 mg/L (MIC50 128 mg/L, MIC90 512 mg/L), and tobramycin MICs ranged from 8 to 256 mg/L (MIC50 32 mg/L, MIC90 64 mg/L).

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of published literature on molecular resistance mechanisms in *S. aureus*; no systematic review protocol or primary experimental study is described.
  • Data or sample: Not stated in the paper; the text cites clinical isolates, strains, plasmids, transposons, integrons, and SCC*mec* elements from prior studies.
  • Main analysis: descriptive synthesis organized by antibiotic class and molecular epidemiology, including referenced tables and figures on SCC*mec* types, *mec*/*ccr* complexes, and MRSA clones.

Limitations

  • The paper states no limitations section.
  • Evident: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search, inclusion criteria, and formal risk-of-bias assessment.
  • Evident: it presents no new primary data and relies on previously published studies; several tables and figures are referenced but not included in the provided text, limiting verification of clone and SCC*mec* details.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms23158088

Cites

239 of 239 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 The most important resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus: antibiotics , mechanisms of action—green arrows. Resistance to beta lactams: 1. Production of penicillin-binding protein PBP2A, 2. * mutations in PBP genes—rare (MODSA), 3. beta-lactamases production -usually narrow substrate spectrum. Glycopeptide resistance: 4. VanA operon (modification of the antibiotic binding site), Linezolid resistance: 5. adenylyl-N-methyltransferase Cfr-modification 23S rRNA of bacterial ribosome. Resistance to MLS-B (macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins B): 5. Erm—erythromycin ribosome methylation. Aminoglycosides resistance: 6. antibiotics inactivation by tansferases. Fluoroinolones resistance: 7. mutations in gyrA and gyrB (topoisomerase II) and parC (grlA) and parE (topoisomerase IV) genes (modification of the antibiotic binding site), 8. removal from the bacterial cell by the efflux pump.
Figure 1 The most important resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus: antibiotics , mechanisms of action—green arrows. Resistance to beta lactams: 1. Production of penicillin-binding protein PBP2A, 2. * mutations in PBP genes—rare (MODSA), 3. beta-lactamases production -usually narrow substrate spectrum. Glycopeptide resistance: 4. VanA operon (modification of the antibiotic binding site), Linezolid resistance: 5. adenylyl-N-methyltransferase Cfr-modification 23S rRNA of bacterial ribosome. Resistance to MLS-B (macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins B): 5. Erm—erythromycin ribosome methylation. Aminoglycosides resistance: 6. antibiotics inactivation by tansferases. Fluoroinolones resistance: 7. mutations in gyrA and gyrB (topoisomerase II) and parC (grlA) and parE (topoisomerase IV) genes (modification of the antibiotic binding site), 8. removal from the bacterial cell by the efflux pump.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 General scheme of SCCmec cassete.
Figure 2 General scheme of SCCmec cassete.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Van A operon. IR—inverted repeats, ORF—open reading frame.
Figure 3 Van A operon. IR—inverted repeats, ORF—open reading frame.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Erm methylase production by S. aureus is regulated at the translational level. RBS—ribosome binding site, M14 and M15—macrolides with a 14- and 15-member ring. (A) In the absence of M14 and M15 macrolides, a leader peptide is produced that attaches to the mRNA preventing translation of the methylase Erm (A,B). When the bacterial ribosome is blocked by macrolides, the leader peptide is not translated and the RNA conformation changes in such a way that methylase poduction is possible.
Figure 4 Erm methylase production by S. aureus is regulated at the translational level. RBS—ribosome binding site, M14 and M15—macrolides with a 14- and 15-member ring. (A) In the absence of M14 and M15 macrolides, a leader peptide is produced that attaches to the mRNA preventing translation of the methylase Erm (A,B). When the bacterial ribosome is blocked by macrolides, the leader peptide is not translated and the RNA conformation changes in such a way that methylase poduction is possible.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 6 Not valid · 95 Not checked · 5 Own results and interpretations

57 more claims

Create a free account to see all 106 claims and to verify the 155 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 35
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 242 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. (2022, February 03). Taxonomy Browser (Staphylococcus), Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi.

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Kowalewski, C., Krolak-Ulinska, A., & Marusza, W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Dermatology, Immunodermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Warsaw, Koszykowa 82a, 02-008 Warsaw, Poland
  • Academy of Face Sculpting, Jana Kazimierza 11B, 01-248 Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Marusza, Wojciech
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
23
Issue
15
Pages
8088
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286587477
Cited by
412
References
242
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 13
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, antibiotic resistance, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, beta-lactam resistance, mec gene, glycopeptide resistance, vancomycin resistance, oxazolidinone resistance, linezolid, aminoglycoside resistance, fluoroquinolone resistance, tetracycline resistance, mupirocin resistance, fusidic acid resistance, daptomycin resistance, molecular epidemiology, virulence genes
MeSH terms
Aminoglycosides, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Resistance, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms23158088
The paper
Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Kowalewski, C., Krolak-Ulinska, A., & Marusza, W. (2022). Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158088

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.