Cited by 89Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityActinomycetales infections and treatment

Mycotic Infections Acquired outside Areas of Known Endemicity, United States

Open access
Benedict, Kaitlin, Thompson, George R., Deresinski, Stan, Chiller, Tom·2015·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

In the United States, endemic mycoses--blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and histoplasmosis--pose considerable clinical and public health challenges. Although the causative fungi typically exist within broadly defined geographic areas or ecologic niches, some evidence suggests that cases have occurred in humans and animals not exposed to these areas. We describe cases acquired outside regions of traditionally defined endemicity. These patients often have severe disease, but diagnosis may be delayed because of a low index of suspicion for mycotic disease, and many more cases probably go entirely undetected. Increased awareness of these diseases, with a specific focus on their potential occurrence in unusual areas, is needed. Continued interdisciplinary efforts to reevaluate and better describe areas of true endemicity are warranted, along with a more nuanced view of the notion of endemicity. The term "nonendemic" should be used with care; mycoses in such regions might more accurately be considered "not known to be endemic."

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2111.141950

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Locally acquired infections outside these areas in the US have been reported, showing that the geographic range of histoplasmosis in the US is wider than is often appreciated.

    “Locally acquired infections outside these areas in the US have been reported, showing that the geographic range of histoplasmosis in the US is wider than is often appreciated [163].”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [163]

  • Most blastomycosis cases are thought to occur in the midwestern, south-central, and southeastern states, in areas surrounding the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys, the Great Lakes, and the Saint Lawrence River.

    “In the United States, most blastomycosis cases are thought to occur in the midwestern, south-central, and southeastern states, in areas surrounding the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys, the Great Lakes, and the Saint Lawrence River.”
  • The infection's true range is broader than generally appreciated.

    “Cases also occur outside these regions, indicating that the infection’s true range is broader than generally appreciated (4,5).”
  • Blastomycosis can occur in areas outside those where it is commonly recognized.

    “Blastomycosis also can occur in areas outside those where it is commonly recognized (4) and might be emerging in new areas, such as east-central New York (5).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Martin DS, Smith DT. Blastomycosis I; a review of the literature. Am Rev Tuberc. 1939;39:275-304.
  2. Concise Medical Dictionary. 8th ed. [cited 2015 Sep 1]. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/ acref/9780199557141.001.0001/acref-9780199557141 Address for correspondence: Kaitlin Benedict, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benedict, K., Thompson, G. R., Deresinski, S., & Chiller, T.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Benedict, Kaitlin
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2015-11
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1935-1941
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W1807981409
Cited by
89
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, endemic mycoses, delayed diagnosis, underdiagnosis, United States
MeSH terms
Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, Humans, Lung Diseases, Fungal, United States, Endemic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review