The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Bat-HKU2–like Coronavirus in Swine, China, 2017
Open accessAbstract
We identified from suckling piglets with diarrhea in China a new bat-HKU2-like porcine coronavirus (porcine enteric alphacoronavirus). The GDS04 strain of this coronavirus shares high aa identities (>90%) with the reported bat-HKU2 strains in Coronaviridae-wide conserved domains, suggesting that the GDS04 strain belongs to the same species as HKU2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kobuviruses—A Comprehensive Review
Reuter, G., Boros, Á., & Pankovics, P. (2011) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.677 · Cited by 188 · cited 1×
“S pathogens are thought to be responsible for porcine diarrhea, including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) (1), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (2), porcine deltacoronavirus (3), porcine group A rotavirus (4), and emerging viruses like porcine kobuvirus (5).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, L., Li, J., Zhou, Q., Xu, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Xue, C., Wen, Z., & Cao, Y.
- Venue
- Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1607-1609
- ISSN
- 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6059
- OpenAlex
- W2726784030
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Bat-HKU2–like Coronavirus in Swine, China, 2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid2309.170915
- The paper
- Gong, L., Li, J., Zhou, Q., Xu, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Xue, C., Wen, Z., & Cao, Y. (2017). A New Bat-HKU2–like Coronavirus in Swine, China, 2017. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2309.170915
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
