Cited by 188Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyAnimal Virus Infections StudiesViral Infections and Immunology Research

Kobuviruses—A Comprehensive Review

Reuter, Gábor, Boros, Ákos, Pankovics, Péter·2011·Reviews in Medical Virology

Abstract

Kobuviruses are members of the large and growing family Picornaviridae . Until now, two official, Aichi virus and Bovine kobuvirus, and one candidate kobuvirus species, ‘porcine kobuvirus’, have been identified in human, cattle and swine, respectively. In addition, kobu‐like viruses were detected very recently in the bat. Aichi virus could be one of the causative agents of gastroenteritis in humans, and kobuviruses probably also cause diarrhoea in cattle and swine. Although Aichi virus has been detected relatively infrequently (0–3%) in human diarrhoea, high seroprevalence, up to 80–95% at the age of 30–40, was found indicating the general nature of infection in different human populations. In the previous years, much new information has accumulated relating to kobuviruses and their host species. This review summarises the current knowledge on kobuviruses including taxonomy, biology and viral characteristics, and covers all aspects of infection including epidemiology, clinical picture, host species diversity, laboratory diagnosis and it gives a summary about possible future perspectives. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rmv.677

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kobuviruses have been isolated from dogs and other mammals with diarrhoeic symptoms.

    “Whilst we cannot assume that these viruses cause disease, kobuviruses have been isolated from dogs and other mammals with diarrhoeic symptoms (Reuter, Boros, and Pankovics 2011; Di Martino et al. 2013).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Reuter, Boros, and Pankovics 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuter, G., Boros, Á., & Pankovics, P.
Affiliations
National Center for Public Health and Pharmacy (HU)
Corresponding author
Reuter, Gábor
Venue
Reviews in Medical Virology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
32-41
ISSN
  • 1052-9276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1654
OpenAlex
W2163875422
Cited by
188
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews in Medical Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Keywords
picornavirus, Aichi virus, porcine kobuvirus, virus taxonomy, viral biology, gastroenteritis, seroprevalence, clinical picture, laboratory diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Humans, Picornaviridae Infections, Swine, Kobuvirus, Host Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review