Cited by 5Architecture, Modernity, and DesignDisability Rights and RepresentationAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The missing link in implementation of universal design: the barrier between legislative framework and architectural practice

Open access
Ryhl Camilla·2014·Assistive Technology Research Series

Abstract

The research project ‘Universal Design in Architecture: a new strategy for implementation’ investigates the understanding of UD as a legislative and architectural concept as perceived from the point of view of the practicing architect. The project is based on theoretical studies of multisensory architecture and on qualitative interviews with 7 practicing architects from Norway and Denmark and case studies of their work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-61499-403-9-433

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Camilla, R.
Venue
Assistive Technology Research Series
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2014
Pages
433-434
ISSN
1383-813X
OpenAlex
W1475893847
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • IOS Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture, Modernity, and Design
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
universal design, accessibility legislation, architects' perceptions, multisensory architecture, architectural practice, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review