Cited by 21Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

What are the Costs of Improving Access to Specialists through eConsultation? The Champlain BASE Experience

Open access
Liddy Clare, Deri Armstrong Catherine, Drosinis Paul, Mito-Yobo Ferdinand, Afkham Amir, Keely Erin·2015·Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Abstract

Excessive wait times and poor access to care are among the most significant problems facing health care service delivery in Canada and beyond. We implemented the Champlain BASE eConsult service in the region of Ottawa, Canada to increase access to specialist care. We have collected ongoing utilization data and provider surveys over a three year period, providing a unique opportunity to explore the economic aspects of this multispecialty eConsult service. This is an economic evaluation from the perspective of the payer: the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care of Ontario. All eConsults submitted during April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2014 were included. We attributed cost savings only to those cases where an eConsult led to the avoidance of a face-to-face specialist visit. A total of 2606 eConsults directed to 27 different speciality groups were included. In 40.3% (n=1051) of cases processed, a face-to-face specialist visit was originally planned but avoided as a result of eConsult, while 29% led to a referral. The estimated cost per eConsult for Years 1, 2, and 3 were $131.05, $10.34, and $6.45 respectively. Results from a sensitivity analysis project that the eConsult service will break even once we reach 7818 eConsults. This is one of the first studies to examine costs across a multispecialty eConsult service. We saw a marked decrease in the cost per eConsult over each annual period. Future research is needed to identify and examine similar outcomes that may lead to cost savings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-61499-505-0-67

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other eConsult services are independent of individual health records and use secure web-based portals to link providers, such as Champlain BASE, TNMG, and KSYOS, or harness secure intranet e-mail such as AKO.

    “Other eConsult services are independent of individual health records and use a secure web-based portals to link providers, such as the Champlain BASE in Canada, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] TNMG in Brazil, [33][34][35][36] and KSYOS in The Netherlands, 37 or harness secure intranet e-mail as the means of communication, such as Army Knowledge Online (AKO).38”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 21

Authors
Clare, L., Catherine, D. A., Paul, D., Ferdinand, M.-Y., Amir, A., & Erin, K.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2015
Volume
209
Pages
67-74
ISSN
0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W413404106
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-consultation, access to specialist care, waiting time, cost reduction, payer perspective, specialist referral, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services Accessibility, Medicine, Ontario, Health Care Costs, Remote Consultation, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review