Defining cyberbullying: A multiple perspectives approach
Abstract
To date, there has been a lack of consensus among researchers, practitioners, and laypersons about the definition of cyberbullying. Researchers have typically applied the key characteristics of intent to harm, power imbalance, and repetition from the definition of traditional bullying to cyberbullying, but how these characteristics transfer from the real world to a technology-mediated environment remains ambiguous. Moreover, very few studies have specifically investigated how cyberbullying is defined from the perspective of bullies, victims and bystanders. To this end, this article will propose a three-part definition of cyberbullying, which incorporates the perspective of bullies, victims and bystanders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repetition may occur through a single act of perpetration that is repeatedly shared.
“For example, repetition may occur through a single act of perpetration that is repeatedly shared (18, 22);”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Efforts to establish a universal cyberbullying definition have largely relied on deductive, theory-driven approaches or consensus-based approaches involving cyberbullying researchers.
“Efforts to establish a universal cyberbullying definition have largely relied on deductive, theory-driven approaches (18, 43), or on consensus-based approaches involving cyberbullying researchers (53).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Defining cyberbullying has proven challenging due to a lack of consensus regarding its definition and criteria.
“Defining cyberbullying has proven challenging due to a lack of consensus regarding its definition and criteria, with researchers unable to agree upon a standardized definition (15, 18, 43, 44), reflecting its characterization in the literature as a complex and multifaceted phenomenon (45).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Researchers have advocated for incorporating these perspectives to ensure stronger conceptual alignment.
“As a result, researchers have advocated for these perspectives to be incorporated to ensure stronger conceptual alignment (14, 18, 43, 54, 55).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cyberbullying: A concept analysis of defining attributes and additional influencing factors
Peter, I.-K., & Petermann, F. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.013 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Kasturiratna, K. T. A. S., Hartanto, A., Chen, C. H. Y., Tong, E. M. W., & Majeed, N. M. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02011-6 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Menin, D., Guarini, A., Mameli, C., Skrzypiec, G., & Brighi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100221 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Defining Cyberbullying: a Multifaceted Definition Based on the Perspectives of Emerging Adults
Alipan, A., Skues, J. L., Theiler, S., & Wise, L. (2020) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-019-00018-6 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation“The thing is, it follows you everywhere”: Child and adolescent conceptions of cyberbullying
Leduc, K., Nagar, P. M., Caivano, O., & Talwar, V. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107180 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Intervening Practices for Cyberbullying Prevention
Marzano, G. (2018) · Lupine Online Journal of Nursing & Health care · doi:10.32474/lojnhc.2018.01.000108 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Afzal, K. I. (2016) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Behaviour · doi:10.4172/2375-4494.1000311 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kaluarachchi, C., Sedera, D., & Warren, M. J. (2025) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104268 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Workplace Cyberbullying and Online Harassment as an Organizational Threat
Kallis, R. B., & Meluch, A. L. (2020) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4912-4.ch009 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Demirdiş, B., & Demirdiş, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Inquiry · doi:10.37093/ijsi.1460112 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Smith, E. J., Rai, R., Scase, M. O., & Wilson, A. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1746672
Karikari, I., & Brown, J. M. (2017) · Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) · doi:10.7912/c2f943
The Successful Foreign Language Classroom: Affect, Empathy, and Engagement
Mower, E. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/cc13-d313
Marzano, G. (2019) · Advances in early childhood and K-12 education · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8076-8.ch001
Workplace Cyberbullying and Online Harassment as an Organizational Threat
Kallis, R. B., & Meluch, A. L. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4503-7.ch076
Workplace Cyberbullying and Online Harassment as an Organizational Threat
Kallis, R. B., & Meluch, A. L. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5594-4.ch075
Cyberbullying on Chinese Social Media
Liu, J., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Guo, J., & Prieler, M. (2022) · Advances in social networking and online communities book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5426-8.ch008
العوامل النفسية الكامنة وراء الحكم الخلقي فى علاقته بالتنمر الإلكترونى لدى المراهقين
حجاج, ر. ي. م. (2023) · مجلة كلية التربية جامعة بنها · doi:10.21608/jfeb.2023.213310.1690
Bullying in Peer Review: A Neglected Issue?
Li, H., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-024-09587-8
- Authors
- Alexandra, A., Jason, S., Stephen, T., & Lisa, W.
- Venue
- Studies in health technology and informatics
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 219
- Pages
- 9-13
- ISSN
- 0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2299693955
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, definition of cyberbullying, multiple perspectives, bullying perpetrators, victims, bystanders, intent to harm, power imbalance, repetition, traditional bullying
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Terminology as Topic, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review