Competency Recommendations for Advancing Nursing Informatics in the Next Decade: International Survey Results
Open accessAbstract
The IMIA-NIstudents' and emerging professionals' working group conducted a large international survey in 2015 regarding research trends in nursing informatics. The survey was translated into half-a-dozen languages and distributed through 18 international research collaborators' professional connections. The survey focused on the perspectives of nurse informaticians. A total of 272 participants responded to an open ended question concerning recommendations to advance nursing informatics. Five key areas for action were identified through our thematic content analysis: education, research, practice, visibility and collaboration. This chapter discusses these results with implications for nursing competency development. We propose how components of various competency lists might support the key areas for action. We also identify room to further develop existing competency guidelines to support in-service education for practicing nurses, promote nursing informatics visibility, or improve and facilitate collaboration and integration with other professions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nursing curricula continue to struggle with incorporating basic nursing informatics competencies as part of basic nursing education.
“Nursing curricula continue to struggle with incorporating basic nursing informatics competencies as part of basic nursing education (Ronquillo et al., 2017; Topaz et al., 2016), which will become more worrisome given the growing interest in using AI tools in health systems.”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative (2021) · cites this paper as Ronquillo et al., 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14855 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Charlene, R., Maxim, T., Lisiane, P., Laura-Maria, P., & Raji, N.
- Venue
- Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 232
- Pages
- 119-129
- ISSN
- 0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2443325406
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- nursing informatics, nursing competencies, competence development, research trends, nursing education, in-service training, professional visibility, interprofessional collaboration, competency guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Professional Competence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Nursing Informatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
