Cited by 2Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Machine Learning and Data ClassificationNeural Networks and Applications

Classifying the classifier: dissecting the weight space of neural networks

Open access
Eilertsen Gabriel, Jönsson Daniel, Ropinski Timo, Unger Jonas, Ynnerman Anders·2020·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study on the weights of neural networks, where we interpret each model as a point in a high-dimensional space – the neural weight space. To explore the complex structure of this space, we sample from a diverse selection of training variations (dataset, optimization procedure, architecture, etc.) of neural network classifiers, and train a large number of models to represent the weight space. Then, we use a machine learning approach for analyzing and extracting information from this space. Most centrally, we train a number of novel deep meta-classifiers with the objective of classifying different properties of the training setup by identifying their footprints in the weight space. Thus, the meta-classifiers probe for patterns induced by hyper-parameters, so that we can quantify how much, where, and when these are encoded through the optimization process. This provides a novel and complementary view for explainable AI, and we show how meta-classifiers can reveal a great deal of information about the training setup and optimization, by only considering a small subset of randomly selected consecutive weights. To promote further research on the weight space, we release the neural weight space (NWS) dataset – a collection of 320K weight snapshots from 16K individually trained deep neural networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/faia200209

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabriel, E., Daniel, J., Timo, R., Jonas, U., & Anders, Y.
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2020
ISSN
0922-6389 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091052244
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
meta-classifier, hyperparameter effects, explainable AI, neural network classifier, optimization process, training variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review