Cited by 63Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Cofilin Rods and Aggregates Concur with Tau Pathology and the Development of Alzheimer's Disease

Rahman, Tasnim, Davies, Danielle S., Tannenberg, Rudi K., Fok, Sandra, Shepherd, Claire, Dodd, Peter R., Cullen, Karen M., Goldsbury, Claire·2014·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Imaging of human brain as well as cellular and animal models has highlighted a role for the actin cytoskeleton in the development of cell pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Rods and aggregates of the actin-associated protein cofilin are abundant in grey matter of postmortem AD brain and rods are found inside neurites in animal and cell models of AD. Objective: We sought further understanding of the significance of cofilin rods/aggregates to the disease process: Do rods/aggregates correlate with AD progression and the development of hallmark neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads? Are cofilin rods/aggregates found in the same neurites as hyperphosphorylated tau? Methods: The specificity of rods/aggregates to AD compared with general aging and their spatial relationship to tau protein was examined in postmortem human hippocampus, inferior temporal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Results: The presence of cofilin rods/aggregates correlated with the extent of tau pathology independent of patient age. Densities of rods/aggregates were fourfold greater in AD compared with aged-matched control brains and rods/aggregates were significantly larger in AD brain. We did not find evidence for our hypothesis that intracellular cofilin rods are localized to tau-positive neuropil threads. Instead, data suggest the involvement of microglia in the clearance of cofilin rods/aggregates and/or in their synthesis in and around amyloid plaques and surrounding neuropil. Conclusion: Cofilin rods and aggregates signify events initiated early in the pathological cascade. Further definition of the mechanisms leading to their formation in the human brain will provide insights into the cellular causes of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-140393

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, T., Davies, D. S., Tannenberg, R. K., Fok, S., Shepherd, C., Dodd, P. R., Cullen, K. M., & Goldsbury, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Goldsbury, Claire
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
1443-1460
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2117170669
Cited by
63
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
cofilin
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Male, Middle Aged, Blotting, Western, tau Proteins, Microglia, Microscopy, Confocal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Actin Depolymerizing Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review