Cited by 98Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Evaluation of a Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Prediction for Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Chouraki, Vincent, for the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project, Reitz, Christiane, Maury, Fleur, Bis, Joshua C., Bellenguez, Celine, Yu, Lei, Jakobsdottir, Johanna +25 more·2016·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Effective prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires the development of risk prediction tools permitting preclinical intervention. We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising common genetic variants associated with AD, evaluated its association with incident AD and assessed its capacity to improve risk prediction over traditional models based on age, sex, education, and APOEɛ4. In eight prospective cohorts included in the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP), we derived weighted sum of risk alleles from the 19 top SNPs reported by the IGAP GWAS in participants aged 65 and older without prevalent dementia. Hazard ratios (HR) of incident AD were estimated in Cox models. Improvement in risk prediction was measured by the difference in C-index (Δ-C), the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI>0). Overall, 19,687 participants at risk were included, of whom 2,782 developed AD. The GRS was associated with a 17% increase in AD risk (pooled HR = 1.17; 95% CI = [1.13-1.21] per standard deviation increase in GRS; p-value = 2.86×10-16). This association was stronger among persons with at least one APOEɛ4 allele (HRGRS = 1.24; 95% CI = [1.15-1.34]) than in others (HRGRS = 1.13; 95% CI = [1.08-1.18]; pinteraction = 3.45×10-2). Risk prediction after seven years of follow-up showed a small improvement when adding the GRS to age, sex, APOEɛ4, and education (Δ-Cindex = 0.0043 [0.0019-0.0067]). Similar patterns were observed for IDI and NRI>0. In conclusion, a risk score incorporating common genetic variation outside the APOEɛ4 locus improved AD risk prediction and may facilitate risk stratification for prevention trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-150749

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PRS incorporating only genome-wide significant SNPs show only a modest improvement in disease prediction over known risk factors such as APOEε4, age, and sex.

    “PRS incorporating only genome-wide significant SNPs have showed only a modest improvement in disease prediction over known risk factors such as APOEε4, age, and sex [119–121].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [120]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chouraki, V., for the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project, Reitz, C., Maury, F., Bis, J. C., Bellenguez, C., Yu, L., Jakobsdottir, J., Mukherjee, S., Adams, H. H., Choi, S. H., Larson, E. B., Fitzpatrick, A., Uitterlinden, A. G., de Jager, P. L., Hofman, A., Gudnason, V., Vardarajan, B., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C., van der Lee, S. J., Lopez, O., Dartigues, J.-F., Berr, C., Amouyel, P., Bennett, D. A., van Duijn, C., DeStefano, A. L., Launer, L. J., Ikram, M. A., Crane, P. K., Lambert, J.-C., Mayeux, R., & Seshadri, S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Lille University, Inserm, Lille University Hospital, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1167 - RID-AGE - Risk factors and molecular determinants of aging-related diseases; Labex Distalz, Lille, France
  • Icelandic Heart Association (IS)
  • Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Departments of Neurology & Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, MA, USA
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Chouraki, Vincent
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2016-08-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
921-932
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2465169012
Cited by
98
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Development of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary approach to ALZheimer's disease
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01ag12100-57-0-2, n01hc085079-024, 1r01hl120393-01a1, n01hc085083-027, n01hc085080-026, UL1TR000124, n01hc085086-022, n01hc25195-41-0-1, n01hc55222-0-0-0)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L023784/2, MR/L501517/1, MR/L010305/1, MR/K013041/1, MR/L023784/1)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, P30AG010129, R01AG030146, U01AG049505, R01AG037212, N01-AG012100, P50AG005133, U01AG006781, RF1AG015473, R01AG020098, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, R01AG054076, R01AG041797, R01AG023629, R01AG033193, RF1AG015819, R01AG015928, R01AG027058, R01AG008122, U24AG056270, U24AG021886)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC085086, N01 HC085079, R01-HL120393, N01 HC085083, HHSN268201500001I, N01 HC085080, R01HL087652, R01HL103612, HHSN 268200800007C, HHSN268201500001C, N01-HC-025195, HHSN268201200036C, N01HC085082, R01HL105756, U01HL080295, N01 HC055222, N01 HC085081)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004610, U01HG006375)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK063491)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017950)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, polygenic risk score
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Educational Status, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Apolipoprotein E4, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review